于喜红,杨瑞,刘继伟,弓莉,周静,王振静,高夏.薄层CT多征象联合多平面重组诊断气管支气管结核[J].中国医学影像技术,2024,40(2):241~245
薄层CT多征象联合多平面重组诊断气管支气管结核
Thin slice CT signs combined with multiplanar reformation for diagnosing tracheobronchial tuberculosis
投稿时间:2023-09-16  修订日期:2023-10-22
DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2024.02.018
中文关键词:  结核  支气管疾病  气管  体层摄影术,X线计算机  多平面重组
英文关键词:tuberculosis  bronchial diseases  trachea  tomography, X-ray computed  multiplanar reformation
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
于喜红 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)医学影像科, 河南 郑州 450008  
杨瑞 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)医学影像科, 河南 郑州 450008  
刘继伟 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)医学影像科, 河南 郑州 450008  
弓莉 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)医学影像科, 河南 郑州 450008  
周静 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)医学影像科, 河南 郑州 450008  
王振静 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)内镜诊疗部, 河南 郑州 450008 jszwgys@163.com 
高夏 河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)科研教学科, 河南 郑州 450008  
摘要点击次数: 379
全文下载次数: 227
中文摘要:
      目的 观察薄层CT多征象联合多平面重组(MPR)诊断气管支气管结核(TBTB)的价值。方法 回顾性分析234例接受胸部薄层CT扫描的TBTB患者并行MPR,观察病变直接与间接表现;比较轴位平扫CT(直接观察法)与其联合MPR(联合观察法)的诊断效能。结果 直接观察法诊断TBTB的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率分别为38.88%(201/517)、98.13%(1 789/1 823)、85.53%(201/235)、84.99%(1 789/2 105)及85.04%(1 990/2 340),联合观察法上述各项分别为91.10%(471/517)、98.85%(1 802/1 823)、95.54%(471/493)、97.51%(1 802/1 848)及97.14%(2 273/2 340);2种方法间敏感度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001),而特异度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 根据薄层CT多征象联合MPR可有效诊断TBTB。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe value of thin slice CT multiple signs combined with multiplanar reformation (MPR) for diagnosing tracheobronchial tuberculosis (TBTB). Methods Data of 234 TBTB patients who underwent chest thin slice CT scanning were retrospectively analyzed. MPR was performed, the direct signs and indirect signs of TBTB were observed. The diagnostic efficacy of axial plain CT images (direct observation) and of MPR combined with the former (combined observation) were compared. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of direct observation was 38.88% (201/517), 98.13% (1 789/1 823), 85.53% (201/235), 84.99% (1 789/2 105) and 85.04% (1 990/2 340), respectively, of combined observation was 91.10% (471/517), 98.85% (1 802/1 823), 95.54% (471/493), 97.51% (1 802/1 848) and 97.14% (2 273/2 340), respectively. Significant differences of sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were found (all P<0.001), whereas no significant difference of specificity was found between 2 methods (P>0.05). Conclusion Thin slice CT multiple signs combined with MPR could be used to effectively diagnose TBTB.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器