殷亮,李章柱,商明艳,李宗昌,唐博文,于丹,甘洁.比较3.0T与5.0T MR胆胰管造影图像质量[J].中国医学影像技术,2024,40(5):690~693
比较3.0T与5.0T MR胆胰管造影图像质量
Comparison on image quality of 3.0T and 5.0T MR cholangiopancreatography
投稿时间:2023-12-19  修订日期:2024-01-25
DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2024.05.012
中文关键词:  胆总管囊肿  场强  胆管造影  磁共振成像  前瞻性研究
英文关键词:choledochal cyst  field strength  cholangiography  magnetic resonance imaging  prospective studies
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
殷亮 山东大学附属山东省立第三医院影像中心, 山东 济南 250030  
李章柱 山东大学附属山东省立第三医院影像中心, 山东 济南 250030  
商明艳 山东大学附属山东省立第三医院影像中心, 山东 济南 250030  
李宗昌 山东大学附属山东省立第三医院影像中心, 山东 济南 250030  
唐博文 山东大学附属山东省立第三医院影像中心, 山东 济南 250030  
于丹 北京联影智能影像技术研究院, 北京 100094  
甘洁 山东大学附属山东省立第三医院影像中心, 山东 济南 250030 ganjie000@sina.com 
摘要点击次数: 121
全文下载次数: 140
中文摘要:
      目的 比较3.0T与5.0T MR胆胰管造影(MRCP)图像质量。方法 前瞻性纳入18例胆管扩张患者(胆管扩张组)和7名健康志愿者(健康组),采用3.0T和5.0T MR仪行MRCP,比较二者显示胆管树细节能力、信噪比(SNR)及图像伪影。结果 胆管扩张组中,5.0T MRCP所示胆管树分支数目、分支总长度及最大分支长度均大于3.0T MRCP(P均<0.05);健康组中,5.0T MRCP所示胆管树分支数目及分支总长度均大于3.0T MRCP(P均<0.05)。2组5.0T MRCP 的SNR均大于3.0T MRCP,但差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。3.0T与5.0T MRCP图像伪影差异无统计学意义(P=0.054)。结论 5.0T MRCP所示胆管树解剖细节较3.0T MRCP更佳,而其SNR及图像伪影与后者相当。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare image quality of 3.0T and 5.0T MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Methods Eighteen patients with bile duct dilation (bile duct dilation group) and 7 healthy volunteers (healthy group) were prospectively enrolled. MRCP was performed with 3.0T and 5.0T scanners, respectively, and the ability for displaying details of bile duct tree, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image artifacts were compared between 3.0T and 5.0T MRCP. Results In bile duct dilation group, the number of branches, total branch length and the maximum branch length of bile duct tree on 5.0T MRCP were all greater than those on 3.0T MRCP (all P<0.05). In healthy group, the number of branches and total branch length of bile duct tree on 5.0T MRCP were both greater than those on 3.0T MRCP (both P<0.05). In both groups, the SNR of 5.0T MRCP was greater than that of 3.0T MRCP, but the difference was not significant (both P>0.05). No significant difference of image artifacts was found between 3.0T and 5.0T MRCP (P=0.054). Conclusion 5.0T MRCP might display better anatomical details of bile duct tree than 3.0T MRCP, with SNR and image artifacts comparable to 3.0T MRCP.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器