尹盼盼,李井平,王少春,陈东风.经阴道实时超声弹性成像诊断宫颈癌:Meta分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2018,34(11):1681~1685
经阴道实时超声弹性成像诊断宫颈癌:Meta分析
Diagnostic value of transvaginal real-time ultrasound elastography for cervical cancer: Meta-analysis
投稿时间:2018-02-24  修订日期:2018-06-26
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201802100
中文关键词:  宫颈肿瘤  荟萃分析  超声检查  弹性成像技术
英文关键词:Uterine cervical neoplasms  Meta-analysis  Ultrasonography  Elasticity imaging techniques
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
尹盼盼 济宁医学院临床医学院, 山东 济宁 272000  
李井平 济宁医学院附属医院超声科, 山东 济宁 272000  
王少春 济宁医学院附属医院超声科, 山东 济宁 272000  
陈东风 济宁医学院附属医院超声科, 山东 济宁 272000 jyfycdf@yahoo.com.cn 
摘要点击次数: 1631
全文下载次数: 565
中文摘要:
      目的 采用Meta分析评价经阴道实时超声弹性成像技术诊断宫颈癌的价值。方法 检索PubMed、Embase、中国知网、万方及维普数据库,按照纳入及排除标准筛选文献,并提取四格表数据。采用STATA 12.0软件检验异质性并进行统计学分析,选择相应效应模型,合并其效应量(敏感度、特异度),绘制综合ROC曲线,并计算AUC。结果 最终纳入25篇文献,包含2 303例患者。经阴道实时超声弹性成像诊断宫颈癌汇总敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比及诊断比值比分别为0.85[95%CI(0.82,0.88)]、0.88[95%CI(0.83,0.92)]、7.40[95%CI(4.80,11.30)]、0.17[95%CI(0.13,0.21)]和44[95%CI(24,82)],AUC为0.92[95%CI(0.89,0.94)]。回归分析显示异质性来源可能与弹性评分截断值有关。结论 经阴道实时超声弹性成像技术对宫颈癌有较高的诊断价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the value of transvaginal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of cervical cancer with Meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases. The literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and four tabular data were extracted. With Meta Disc version STATA 12.0 software, statistical analysis was performed, and heterogeneity of the included articles was tested. Based on the results of heterogeneity test, proper effect model was selected to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Summary ROC curve was obtained, and AUC was calculated. Results A total of 25 literatures were enrolled, including 2 303 patients. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio for transvaginal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of cervical cancer was (95%CI[0.82, 0.88]), 0.88 (95%CI[0.83, 0.92]), 7.40 (95%CI[4.80, 11.30]), 0.17 (95%CI[0.13, 0.21]) and 44 (95%CI[24, 82]), while AUC was 0.92 (95%CI[0.89, 0.94]), respectively. Regression analysis revealed that the heterogeneity might result from the elastic score cutoff.Conclusion Transvaginal real-time elastography has good diagnostic value in diagnosis of cervical cancer.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器