庄仲,刘舰,李飞宇,彭晓刚,赵锡海.轻度狭窄与无狭窄颈动脉斑块高分辨率MRI特征[J].中国医学影像技术,2016,32(8):1209~1213
轻度狭窄与无狭窄颈动脉斑块高分辨率MRI特征
High resolution MRI features of atherosclerotic plaque in carotid arteries with low-grade and non-stenosis
投稿时间:2015-10-19  修订日期:2016-01-08
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2016.08.015
中文关键词:  颈动脉狭窄  斑块,动脉粥样硬化  磁共振成像
英文关键词:Carotid stenosis  Plaque, atherosclerotic  Magnetic resonance imaging
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81271536)。
作者单位E-mail
庄仲 齐齐哈尔市第一医院磁共振室, 黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161005  
刘舰 齐齐哈尔市第一医院磁共振室, 黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161005  
李飞宇 北京大学第一医院医学影像科, 北京 100034  
彭晓刚 齐齐哈尔市第一医院磁共振室, 黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161005 pengxiaogang8765@sina.com 
赵锡海 清华大学医学院生物医学工程系 清华大学生物医学影像研究中心, 北京 100084  
摘要点击次数: 1363
全文下载次数: 851
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨脑血管病患者轻度狭窄或无狭窄颈动脉粥样硬化(AS)斑块的高分辨率MRI(HRMRI)特征。方法 对103例近期出现脑血管病症状且伴颈动脉AS斑块的患者行颈动脉HRMRI。排除图像质量差或颈动脉严重狭窄(狭窄程度≥50%)者。对颈动脉斑块进行定性和定量分析,比较无狭窄(无狭窄组)与轻度狭窄(轻度狭窄组,狭窄程度1%~49%)颈动脉AS斑块的负荷及成分特征差异。结果 最终86例患者共155支颈动脉血管纳入研究,轻度狭窄组24支,无狭窄组131支。无狭窄与轻度狭窄组颈动脉管腔面积[(53.40±15.29)mm2 vs (41.30±11.57)mm2P<0.001]和最大管壁厚度[(2.16±0.90)mm vs (3.30±1.25)mm, P=0.014]差异均有统计学意义,而管壁面积[(31.69±6.80)mm2 vs (32.80±9.33)mm2P=0.581]差异无统计学意义。无狭窄组和轻度狭窄组存在中度风险斑块、高风险斑块者分别占10.69%(14/131)、6.11%(8/131)和20.83%(5/24)、20.83%(5/24)。颈动脉最大管壁厚度与管腔狭窄程度之间呈正相关(r=0.430,P<0.001)。结论 无狭窄或轻度狭窄的颈动脉血管仍存在发生不稳定斑块的风险。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the characteristics of high resolution MRI (HRMRI) in atherosclerotic plaques of low-grade and non-stenosis carotid arteries. Methods A total of 103 patients with recent cerebrovascular symptoms and carotid plaques were underwent carotid HRMRI. Arteries with poor image quality or severe luminal stenosis (≥50%) were excluded. MR images were reviewed for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of plaque characteristics. The plaque burden and the compositional features between carotid arteries with low-grade stenosis (1%-49%) and without stenosis were compared. Results Totally 86 patients (155 carotid arteries) were recruited in this study. Of all patients, 155 carotid arteries including 24 with low-grade stenosis and 131 without stenosis were qualified for analysis. Statistically significant differences were found in lumen area ([53.40±15.29] mm2 vs [41.30±11.57]mm2, P<0.001) and maximum wall thickness ([2.16±0.90] mm vs [3.30±1.25]mm, P=0.014) between carotid arteries with low-grade stenosis and without stenosis. But no significant differences was found in wall area ([31.69±6.80]mm2 vs [32.80±9.33]mm2, P=0.581). The prevalence of middle and high risk plaques were 10.69% (14/131) and 6.11% (8/131) in carotid arteries without stenosis, 20.83% (5/24) and 20.83% (5/24) in carotid arteries with low-grade stenosis. The maximum wall thickness of carotid artery correlated positively with the degree of stenosis (r=0.430, P<0.001). Conclusion Carotid arteries with low-grade stenosis and without stenosis are still at the risk to develop vulnerable plaque.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器