段淼,张开元,武春雪,李京凯,张越,王臣,张苗,卢洁.多模态MR一站式检查诊断颅内静脉血栓[J].中国医学影像技术,2025,41(12):1985~1989
多模态MR一站式检查诊断颅内静脉血栓
One-stop multimodal MR examinations for diagnosing cerebral venous thrombosis
投稿时间:2024-12-23  修订日期:2025-06-16
DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2025.12.010
中文关键词:  颅内血栓形成  磁共振成像  回顾性研究
英文关键词:intracranial thrombosis  magnetic resonance imaging  retrospective studies
基金项目:首都医科大学宣武医院"汇智"人才工程学者计划(HZ2021ZCLJ005)。
作者单位E-mail
段淼 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
北京中医医院顺义医院放射科, 北京 101300 
 
张开元 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
 
武春雪 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
 
李京凯 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
 
张越 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
 
王臣 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
 
张苗 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
zhangmiao_smile@163.com 
卢洁 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科, 北京 100053
磁共振成像脑信息学北京市重点实验室, 北京 100053 
 
摘要点击次数: 88
全文下载次数: 16
中文摘要:
      目的 观察多模态MR一站式检查诊断颅内静脉血栓(CVT)的价值。方法 回顾性分析80例CVT的影像学资料,包括增强MRI(CE-MRI)、增强MR静脉成像(CE-MRV)及MR黑血血栓成像(MRBTI);评估并比较不同MRI技术的诊断效能。结果 CE-MRI显示37例存在脑实质改变,包括17例静脉性脑水肿、12例静脉性脑梗死及8例脑出血。观察者间诊断CVT的一致性较好(k=0.850~0.927,P均<0.001)。MRBTI对皮层静脉血栓的检出率高于CE-MRV(χ2=11.182、P=0.001)。CE-MRI+CE-MRV+MRBTI对皮层静脉和全部节段血栓的检出率均高于CE-MRI+CE-MRV(P均<0.05)。CE-MRI+CE-MRV诊断静脉节段CVT的敏感度为83.02%、特异度为94.19%、阳性预测值为92.12%、阴性预测值为87.12%;CE-MRI+CE-MRV+MRBTI分别为97.85%、98.98%、98.76%及98.23%;CE-MRI+CE-MRV+MRBTI对于静脉节段CVT的诊断效能(曲线下面积=0.980)优于CE-MRI+CE-MRV(曲线下面积=0.880,Z=4.159,P<0.001)。结论 多模态MR一站式检查可有效诊断CVT。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe the value of one-stop multimodal MR examinations for diagnosing cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods Imaging data, including contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), contrast-enhanced MR venography (CE-MRV) and MR black-blood thrombus imaging (MRBTI)of 80 cases of CVT were retrospectively analyzed, and the diagnostic efficacy of different MRI techniques were evaluated and compared. Results CE-MRI revealed cerebral parenchymal changes in 37 cases, including 17 cases of venous cerebral edema, 12 cases of venous cerebral infarction and 8 cases of cerebral hemorrhage. The interobserver consistency for diagnosing CVT was good (k=0.850—0.927, all P<0.001). The detection rate of cortical venous thrombosis of MRBTI was higher than that of CE-MRV (χ2=11.182, P=0.001). The detection rate of CE-MRI+CE-MRV+MRBTI for cortical venous and total segmental thrombosis were both higher than that of CE-MRI+CE-MRV (both P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CE-MRI+CE-MRV for diagnosing segmental CVT was 83.02%, 94.19%, 92.12% and 87.12%, respectively, of CE-MRI+CE-MRV+MRBTI was 97.85%, 98.98%, 98.76% and 98.23%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of CE-MRI+CE-MRV+MRBTI (area under the curve=0.980) was superior to that of CE-MRI+CE-MRV (area under the curve=0.880, Z=4.159, P<0.001). Conclusion One-stop multimodal MR examinations could effectively diagnose CVT.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器