冯杰,詹娜萍,肖金霞,冯益炎,蔡斌彬,曾祯,张超.常规超声检测骨龄及鉴别性早熟与乳房过早发育[J].中国医学影像技术,2023,39(11):1702~1705
常规超声检测骨龄及鉴别性早熟与乳房过早发育
Conventional ultrasound for evaluation on bone age and differential diagnosis of precocious puberty and premature thelarche
投稿时间:2023-07-20  修订日期:2023-09-13
DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2023.11.024
中文关键词:  年龄测定,骨骼  青春期,早熟  超声检查  前瞻性研究
英文关键词:age determination by skeleton  puberty, precocious  ultrasonography  prospective studies
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
冯杰 厦门医学院附属海沧医院超声影像科, 福建 厦门 361026 105139958@qq.com 
詹娜萍 厦门医学院附属海沧医院儿科, 福建 厦门 361026  
肖金霞 厦门医学院附属海沧医院儿科, 福建 厦门 361026  
冯益炎 厦门医学院附属海沧医院超声影像科, 福建 厦门 361026  
蔡斌彬 厦门医学院附属海沧医院超声影像科, 福建 厦门 361026  
曾祯 厦门医学院附属海沧医院超声影像科, 福建 厦门 361026  
张超 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院超声影像科, 湖北 武汉 430030  
摘要点击次数: 1535
全文下载次数: 716
中文摘要:
      目的 观察常规超声检测骨龄的可行性及其鉴别特发性中枢性性早熟(ICPP)与乳房过早发育(PT)的价值。方法 前瞻性纳入139名儿童,于1周内完成超声骨龄评估和左手及腕部X线检查,分别针对后者以Greulich-Pyle(GP)图谱法和Tanner-Whitehouse 3(TW3)法评估骨龄,评价超声与GP结果的相关性;比较超声与TW3骨龄差、GP与TW3骨龄差之间的差异,观察以超声骨龄鉴别ICPP与PT的价值。结果 超声评估骨龄与TW3法结果呈高度正相关(全组:r=0.96;男性r=0.97;女性r=0.96)。超声骨龄与TW3骨龄之差为(-0.3±0.7)岁,GP骨龄与TW3骨龄之差为(-0.2±1.1)岁,其间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ICPP患儿(n=9)超声骨龄与实际年龄差明显大于PT(n=10)患儿 。结论 常规超声可用于测量骨龄,并对鉴别诊断ICPP与PT具有一定价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the feasibility of conventional ultrasound for evaluation on bone age and differential diagnosis of idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP) and premature thelarche (PT). Methods Totally 139 children were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasonic evaluation of bone age was performed. X-ray films of left hand and wrist were acquired within 1 week, and bone age was evaluated using Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3) and Greulich-Pyle (GP) atlas method, respectively. The correlation between ultrasound and TW3 bone age was evaluation. The difference of bone age between ultrasound and TW3, between GP and TW3 were compared, and the value of ultrasound in differentiating ICPP from PT was explored. Results There was high correlation between ultrasound and TW3 bone age (whole group: r=0.96; male: r=0.97; female: r=0.96). The difference between ultrasound and TW3 bone age was (-0.3±0.7) years, between GP and TW3 bone age was (-0.2±1.1) years, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The difference between chronological age and ultrasound bone age in children with ICPP (n=9) was significantly greater than that in children with PT (n=10) ( years vs. years, P<0.05). Conclusion Conventional ultrasound could be used to measure bone age, which was also valuable for differential diagnosis of ICPP and PT.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器