蔡晓艺,季旸,王国华,万俊,张振.双能量CT测量胰腺细胞外体积分数及标准化碘浓度评估2型糖尿病[J].中国医学影像技术,2023,39(3):385~388
双能量CT测量胰腺细胞外体积分数及标准化碘浓度评估2型糖尿病
Pancreatic extracellular volume fraction and normalized iodine concentration measured with dual-energy CT for evaluating type 2 diabetes mellitus
投稿时间:2022-10-14  修订日期:2023-01-05
DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2023.03.015
中文关键词:  糖尿病,2型  胰腺  血红蛋白A,糖基化    体层摄影术,X线计算机
英文关键词:diabetes mellitus, type 2  pancreas  hemoglobin A, glycosylated  iodine  tomography, X-ray computed
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
蔡晓艺 康复大学青岛医院(青岛市市立医院)放射科, 山东 青岛 266011
大连医科大学研究生院, 辽宁 大连 116044 
 
季旸 康复大学青岛医院(青岛市市立医院)超声科, 山东 青岛 266011  
王国华 康复大学青岛医院(青岛市市立医院)放射科, 山东 青岛 266011 wangguohua89@163.com 
万俊 康复大学青岛医院(青岛市市立医院)放射科, 山东 青岛 266011  
张振 康复大学青岛医院(青岛市市立医院)放射科, 山东 青岛 266011  
摘要点击次数: 2059
全文下载次数: 637
中文摘要:
      目的 观察双能量CT测量胰腺细胞外体积分数(fECV)及标准化碘浓度(nIC)评估2型糖尿病(T2DM)的价值。方法 根据T2DM诊断标准将76例接受腹部双能量CT三期增强扫描患者分为糖尿病组(n=34)和非糖尿病组(n=42),于平衡期碘基图测量胰腺fECV和nIC;对比组间差异,分析胰腺fECV、nIC与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的相关性,评估其诊断T2DM的价值。结果 糖尿病组HbA1c、胰腺fECV及nIC均明显高于非糖尿病组(P均<0.001)。胰腺fECV (rs=0.593、0.397)及nIC (rs=0.479、0.424)在全部76例患者及糖尿病组34例患者中均与HbA1c呈中等或弱正相关(P均<0.05)。胰腺fECV与nIC联合诊断T2DM的敏感度、特异度及曲线下面积(AUC)分别为76.50%、83.30%及0.824[95%CI(0.728,0.919)],其AUC明显高于单一nIC (Z=2.002,P=0.045)而与单一fECV无明显差异(Z=1.158,P=0.247)。结论 双能量CT所测胰腺fECV及nIC均与HbA1c有一定相关性,有助于诊断T2DM。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe the value of pancreatic extracellular volume fraction (fECV) and normalized iodine concentration (nIC) measured with dual-energy CT for evaluating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods A total of 76 patients with abdominal diseases who underwent abdominal dual energy CT three-phase enhancement scan were enrolled and divided into diabetes group (n=34) and non diabetes group (n=42) according to T2DM diagnostic criteria. Pancreatic fECV and nIC were measured based on iodine maps at equilibrium phase. The indexes were compared between groups, the correlations of pancreatic fECV, nIC and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were analyzed, and the value of pancreatic fECV and nIC for diagnosing T2DM was evaluated. Results HbA1c, pancreatic fECV and nIC of diabetes group were significantly higher than those of non diabetes group (all P<0.001). Among all 76 patients and 34 cases in diabetes group, pancreatic fECV (rs=0.593, 0.397) and nIC (rs=0.479, 0.424) were moderately or weakly positively correlated with HbA1c (all P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of pancreatic fECV combining with nIC for diagnosing T2DM was 76.50%, 83.30% and 0.824 (95%CI), and the AUC was higher than that of single nIC (Z=2.002, P=0.045) but no significant different with that of single fECV (Z=1.158, P=0.247). Conclusion Pancreatic fECV and nIC measured with dual-energy CT had certain correlation with HbA1c, hence being helpful for diagnosing T2DM.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器