| 郭文佳,罗丹丹,徐荟,刘瑜煊,何鸿丽,谭惠敏,李胜利.新型智能产前超声技术SFA自动识别与获取胎儿标准切面[J].中国医学影像技术,2023,39(1):65~69 |
| 新型智能产前超声技术SFA自动识别与获取胎儿标准切面 |
| Novel intelligent ultrasound smart fetus advanced (SFA) technique for automatic distinguishing and acquiring fetal standard sections |
| 投稿时间：2022-08-24 修订日期：2022-11-04 |
| DOI：10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2023.01.014 |
| 中文关键词: 胎儿|超声检查,产前|人工智能 |
| 英文关键词:fetus|ultrasonography, prenatal|artificial intelligence |
| 基金项目:深圳市科技计划项目(JCYJ20210324130812035)。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1993 |
| 全文下载次数: 928 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 观察新型智能产前超声技术SFA自动识别与获取胎儿标准切面的临床价值。方法 分别以传统超声和SFA技术识别并获取1 127胎≥16孕周单胎胎儿的标准切面,比较获取图像成功率(实际获取图像数/应获取图像数×100%)和图像合格率(合格图像数/实际获取图像数×100%),以及获取不同孕周胎儿标准切面所用时间。结果 SFA获取胎儿经丘脑横切面、经侧脑室横切面、四腔心切面、脐带腹壁入口切面、双肾水平横切面的成功率均低于传统超声(P均<0.05),获取经侧脑室横切面、四腔心切面、腹围横切面的合格率均高于传统超声,获取膀胱水平横切面合格率低于传统超声(P均<0.05)。对不同胎龄胎儿,SFA获取标准切面所用时间均少于传统超声(P均<0.05)。结论 SFA技术获取胎儿标准切面具有一定临床价值,且用时少于传统超声。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the clinical application value of a novel intelligent ultrasound smart fetus advanced (SFA) technique for automatically identifying and obtaining fetal standard sections. Methods Standard sections of 1 127 singleton fetuses over 16 gestational weeks were identified and obtained with SFA and traditional ultrasound techniques, respectively. The success rate of image acquisition (the actual number of images acquired/the number of images should be acquired×100%) and image qualification rate (the number of qualified images/the number of images should be acquired×100%), and the time consumption for obtaining standard sections in different gestational week fetuses with SFA and traditional ultrasound techniques were compared. Results The success rate of SFA for the transection of thalamus, transection of lateral ventricle, four chamber view, section of umbilical cord abdominal wall entrance and transection of bilateral kidneys were all lower than those of traditional ultrasound (all P<0.05). The qualification rate of SFA for transection of lateral ventricle, four chamber view and transection of abdomen were all higher than those of traditional ultrasound, while of SFA for transections of bladder was lower than that of traditional ultrasound (all P<0.05). For fetuses of different gestational weeks, the time consumption for obtaining standard sections of SFA were shorter than those of traditional ultrasound (all P<0.05). Conclusion SFA had certain clinical value for automatically identifying and obtaining fetal standard sections with shorter time compared with traditional ultrasound. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
