白志勇,刘芳,栾好梅,张华斌.对比超声引导下经前斜角肌与经颈静脉行星状神经节阻滞的有效性及安全性[J].中国医学影像技术,2019,35(8):1151~1154
对比超声引导下经前斜角肌与经颈静脉行星状神经节阻滞的有效性及安全性
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block: Comparison of through anterior scalenus muscle and through internal jugular vein
投稿时间:2019-03-01  修订日期:2019-06-03
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201903004
中文关键词:  星状神经节  神经传导阻滞  颈静脉  超声检查  影像引导
英文关键词:stellate ganglion  nerve block  jugular veins  ultrasonography  imaging guided
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
白志勇 清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院超声科 清华大学临床医学院, 北京 102218  
刘芳 清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院超声科 清华大学疼痛科, 北京 102218  
栾好梅 清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院超声科 清华大学临床医学院, 北京 102218  
张华斌 清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院超声科 清华大学临床医学院, 北京 102218 huabinzhang@bjmu.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 2257
全文下载次数: 697
中文摘要:
      目的 对比超声引导下经前斜角肌与经颈静脉行星状神经节阻滞(SGB)的有效性及安全性。方法 将144例颈源性头痛患者随机分为2组,分别行超声引导下经前斜角肌SGB (前斜角肌组,n=72)和超声引导下经颈静脉SGB (颈静脉组,n=72)。比较2组阻滞成功率、霍纳征出现时间及不良反应发生率。结果 前斜角肌组与颈静脉组阻滞成功率[97.22%(70/72) vs 98.61%(71/72)]、霍纳征出现时间[术后(2.18±0.96) min vs术后(1.96±0.87) min]差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。前斜角肌组不良反应发生率为19.44%(14/72),颈静脉组4.17%(3/72),差异有统计学意义(P=0.01)。结论 超声引导下穿过前斜角肌与穿透颈静脉行SGB均安全有效,后者穿刺时不良反应较少。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (UGSGB) through anterior scalenus muscle (ASM) and through internal jugular vein (IJV). Methods Totally 144 patients with cervicogenic headache were distributed into 2 groups randomly. USSGB was performed through ASM (ASM group, n=72) or through IJV (IJV group, n=72), respectively. The ratio of successful blocks, the appearing time of Honer syndrome and the ratio of adverse reaction were compared between two groups. Results The successful block ratio was 97.22% (70/72) of ASM group and 98.61%(71/72) of IJV group, while Honer syndrome appearing times was (2.18±0.96)min and (1.96±0.87)min after operation, respectively. There was no significant difference between 2 groups (both P>0.05). The adverse reaction ratio was 19.44%(14/72) of SCM group and 4.17%(3/72) of IJV group (P=0.01). Conclusion USSGB through ASM approach and USSGB through IJV approach are both safe and efficient. IJV approach has less adverse reaction than SCM approach.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器