柳计强,张海三,李金平,宋浩,张雨,尹媛媛,穆学涛.流入反转恢复序列在肝移植术后MR门静脉成像中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2019,35(3):412~416
流入反转恢复序列在肝移植术后MR门静脉成像中的应用
Application of inflow reverse recovery sequence in MR portal vein imaging after liver transplantation
投稿时间:2018-08-02  修订日期:2018-12-02
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201808018
中文关键词:  肝移植  流入反转恢复序列  门静脉  磁共振成像
英文关键词:liver transplantation  inflow inversion recovery sequence  portal vein  magnetic resonance imaging
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
柳计强 新乡医学院, 河南 新乡 453003
中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心MRI科, 北京 100039 
 
张海三 新乡医学院第二附属医院放射科, 河南 新乡 453002  
李金平 新乡医学院第三附属医院放射科, 河南 新乡 453003  
宋浩 中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心MRI科, 北京 100039  
张雨 中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心MRI科, 北京 100039  
尹媛媛 中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心MRI科, 北京 100039  
穆学涛 中国人民解放军总医院第三医学中心MRI科, 北京 100039 muxuetao091@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 3368
全文下载次数: 930
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨流入反转恢复(IFIR)序列在肝移植术后门静脉成像中的应用价值。方法 对26例肝移植术后患者依次行上腹部IFIR序列成像和对比增强MRA(CE-MRA),由2名医师采用盲法对门静脉显示质量进行评分,比较2组图像评分的差异并测量吻合口直径。比较2组图像测量值的差异,评价医师间图像质量评分和测量吻合口直径的一致性。结果 26例IFIR序列和CE-MRA均能显示门静脉主干及门静脉左、右支近端血管,图像质量≥ 3分者分别为92.31%(24/26)和96.15%(25/26)。2名医师对IFIR序列与CE-MRA图像质量评分差异均无统计学意义(医师1:Z=-1.077,P=0.282;医师2:Z=-0.629,P=0.529)。2组图像吻合口直径测量值间差异均无统计学意义(医师1:t=0.369,P=0.546;医师2:t=0.020,P=0.889)。2名医师图像质量评分和测量吻合口直径的一致性好。结论 IFIR序列可作为评估肝移植术后门静脉的有效方法之一。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the application value of inflow reversal recovery (IFIR) sequence in portal vein imaging after liver transplantation. Methods IFIR sequence imaging and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) were performed successively on the upper abdomen in 26 patients after liver transplantation. The portal vein display quality of 2 kinds of images was scored and compared independently by 2 radiologists. The diameter of anastomotic stoma was measured and compared, and the consistency of image quality scores and anastomotic diameters were evaluated between the 2 radiologists. Results Both IFIR sequence and CE-MRA could show the main portal vein and the proximal left and right branches of the portal vein in 26 patients, and the image quality score ≥ 3 points was 92.31% (24/26) and 96.15% (25/26), respectively. There was no significant difference of image quality score of IFIR sequence and CE-MRA evaluated by 2 radiologists (radiologist 1:Z=-1.077, P=0.282; radiologist 2:Z=-0.629, P=0.529), nor of the measured diameter of anastomosis between IFIR sequence and CE-MRA (radiologist 1:t=0.369, P=0.546; radiologist 2:t=0.020, P=0.889). The consistency of image quality scores and anastomotic diameters evaluated by the 2 radiologists was good. Conclusion IFIR sequence can be used as an effective method to evaluate portal vein after liver transplantation.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器