黑晶晶,袁建军,魏常华,朱好辉,李杨,丁晓,谷春红.峰值应变离散度评价维持性血液透析患者左心室收缩同步性[J].中国医学影像技术,2018,34(3):340~344 |
峰值应变离散度评价维持性血液透析患者左心室收缩同步性 |
Peak strain dispersion in evaluation of left ventricular systolic synchronicity of maintenance hemodialysis patients |
投稿时间:2017-09-18 修订日期:2017-12-27 |
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201709096 |
中文关键词: 峰值应变离散度 同步性 肾透析 超声心动描记术 |
英文关键词:Peak strain dispersion Synchronicity Renal dialysis Echocardiography |
基金项目:国家卫生计生委2013—2015年度国家临床重点专科建设项目(2013226)、河南省科技攻关计划项目(201602212)。 |
|
摘要点击次数: 2442 |
全文下载次数: 1136 |
中文摘要: |
目的 探讨左心室纵向峰值应变离散度(PSD)评价维持性血液透析(MHD)患者左心室收缩同步性的价值。方法 收集38例MHD患者(MHD组)和45名正常志愿者(对照组),采集心尖二腔、三腔及四腔3个长轴切面连续3个心动周期的二维灰阶动态图像,计算左心室18节段纵向应变达峰时间的标准差(PSD);比较两组间PSD差异,并评价PSD与各参数间的相关性。结果 MHD组PSD MHD组PSD[(54.21±11.55)ms]高于对照组[(35.58±14.37)ms;t=4.653,P < 0.001]。MHD组PSD与左心室质量指数(LVMI)、室间隔舒张末期厚度(IVSd)、左心室后壁舒张末期厚度(LVPWd)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVDd)、左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)均呈正相关(r=0.461、0.466、0.498、0.472、0.414、0.498,P均< 0.05)。结论 MHD患者早期即可出现左心室收缩同步性下降;PSD可早期、定量评价左心室收缩同步性。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To investigate the value of peak strain dispersion (PSD) in evaluation of synchronicity of left ventricle in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods Totally 38 MHD patients (MHD group) and 45 healthy volunteers (control group) were enrolled. Two-dimensional dynamic images, including standard apical two-chamber, long-axis and four-chamber views in 3 consecutive cardiac cycles were acquired, and the standard deviation of time-to-peak longitudinal strain, i.e. PSD, in 18 segments of left ventricle were calculated. The difference of PSD between the two groups and the correlation between PSD and other parameters were assessed. Results PSD of MHD group ([54.21±11.55] ms) was larger than that of control group ([35.58±14.37]ms; t=4.653, P < 0.001). In MHD group, PSD had positive correlation with left ventricular mass index (LVMI), interventricular septum thickness at end-systolic (IVSd), left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastolic (LVPWd), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV; r=0.461, 0.466, 0.498, 0.472, 0.414, 0.498, respectively, all P<0.05). Conclusion Left ventricular systolic synchronicity in MHD patients might be impaired in early stage, which can be quantitatively evaluated with PSD. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|