魏薪,蔡宇燕,唐红,陈茂,冯沅,赵振刚,廖延标.经食管超声心动图双平面法测量主动脉瓣环径[J].中国医学影像技术,2017,33(3):355~359
经食管超声心动图双平面法测量主动脉瓣环径
Biplane-transesophageal echocardiography in measurement of aortic annulus dimension
投稿时间:2016-11-14  修订日期:2017-01-18
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201611074
中文关键词:  超声心动描记术,经食管  经导管主动脉瓣植入术  主动脉瓣环径
英文关键词:Echocardiography, transesophageal  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation  Aortic annulus dimension
基金项目:四川省科技厅科技支撑计划项目(2012FZ0065)。
作者单位E-mail
魏薪 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041  
蔡宇燕 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041  
唐红 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041 hxyyth@qq.com 
陈茂 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041  
冯沅 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041  
赵振刚 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041  
廖延标 四川大学华西医院心内科, 四川 成都 610041  
摘要点击次数: 3117
全文下载次数: 1401
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨经食管超声心动图双平面法测量经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者主动脉瓣环径的可行性。方法 对24例拟行TAVI的患者,术前分别采用经胸超声心动图(2D-TTE)、经食管超声心动图(2D-TEE)、三维经食管超声心动图(3D-TEE)及经食管超声心动图双平面法(Bip-TEE)测量主动脉瓣环径。比较4种方法测量的差异以及3D-TEE测量值与另外3种方法测量值的相关性。结果 2D-TTE、2D-TEE、Bip-TEE与3D-TEE所测的主动脉瓣环径分别为(22.02±2.21)mm、(23.34±2.34)mm、(23.89±2.37)mm;(24.21±2.78)mm,4组测量值总体差异有统计学意义(F=3.88,P=0.01)。3D-TEE与2D-TEE、Bip-TEE所测量主动脉瓣环径差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05),2D-TEE与Bip-TEE测量值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2D-TTE与3D-TEE、2D-TEE、Bip-TEE所测的主动脉瓣环径比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。3D-TEE所测的主动脉瓣环径与2D-TTE、2D-TEE、Bip-TEE测值均呈正相关(r=0.79、0.88、0.94,P均<0.05)。结论 经食管超声心动图双平面法可用于准确测量主动脉瓣环径,从而为TAVI提供可靠的瓣膜型号选择依据。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the feasibility of biplane-transesophageal echocardiography (Bip-TEE) in measuring the aortic annulus dimension (AAD). Methods Totally 24 patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were collected, and their AAD was measured by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE), two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE), Bip-TEE and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) respectively. These four methods were compared with each other. The correlation between 3D-TEE measures and other three methods were analyzed. Results The AAD measured by 2D-TTE, 2D-TEE, Bip-TEE and 3D-TEE were (22.02±2.21)mm, (23.34±2.34)mm, (23.89±2.37)mm, (24.21±2.78)mm, respectively.The differences among 4 groups was significant (F=3.88, P=0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between Bip-TEE and 3D-TEE, 2D-TEE and 3D-TEE, Bip-TEE and 2D-TEE (all P>0.05). There were significant differences between 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE, 2D-TTE and Bip-TEE, 2D-TTE and 3D-TEE (all P<0.05). The AAD measured by 3D-TEE were positively correlated with that of 2D-TTE, 2D-TEE, Bip-TE (r=0.79, 0.88, 0.94, all P<0.05). Conclusion Bip-TEE is a feasible method to measure the AAD rapidly and can provide reliable measurements for the prosthetic valve size in TAVI.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器