周金发,朱建国,李海歌,张发明,刘斐,周良,翟华俊,曹鹏.MRI定量参数评估肠道克罗恩病病变活动性[J].中国医学影像技术,2016,32(12):1895~1899
MRI定量参数评估肠道克罗恩病病变活动性
MRI quantitative parameters in assessment of activity of Crohn's disease
投稿时间:2016-06-20  修订日期:2016-09-21
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2016.12.026
中文关键词:  克罗恩病  Harvey-Bradshow指数  C反应蛋白  扩散磁共振成像  对比剂  表观扩散系数  容积转运常数
英文关键词:Crohn's disease  Harvey-Bradshow index  C-reactive protein  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging  Contrast media  Apparent diffusion coefficient  Volume transfer constant
基金项目:2014年江苏省级条件建设与民生科技专项资金(第三批;BL2014097)、南京医科大学科技发展基金重点项目(2015NJMUID035)。
作者单位E-mail
周金发 南京医科大学第二附属医院 第二临床医学院放射科, 江苏 南京 210011  
朱建国 南京医科大学第二附属医院 第二临床医学院放射科, 江苏 南京 210011  
李海歌 南京医科大学第二附属医院 第二临床医学院放射科, 江苏 南京 210011  
张发明 南京医科大学第二附属医院 肠病中心, 江苏 南京 210011  
刘斐 南京医科大学第二附属医院 第二临床医学院放射科, 江苏 南京 210011  
周良 南京医科大学第二附属医院 第二临床医学院放射科, 江苏 南京 210011 zhouliang62621@sina.com 
翟华俊 南京医科大学第二附属医院 第二临床医学院放射科, 江苏 南京 210011  
曹鹏 通用电器医疗集团中国生命科学影像实验室, 上海 200240  
摘要点击次数: 2080
全文下载次数: 951
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨MRI定量参数ADC与容积转运常数(Ktrans)评估肠道克罗恩病(CD)病变活动性的应用价值。方法 收集50例回盲部单发病灶的CD患者,依次行常规MR、DWI和动态增强MRI(DCE-MRI)扫描,测量ADC和Ktrans值,同时评估患者Harvey-Bradshow指数(HBI)和血清C反应蛋白(CRP)浓度。根据HBI将50例患者分为重度活动组、轻中度活动组及静止组,比较3组间Ktrans、ADC值的差异;对Ktrans、ADC值与对应的HBI、CRP行相关性分析。结果 50例CD患者中,静止组16例、轻中度活动组21例、重度活动组13例。3组Ktrans、ADC值的差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),组间两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。病变肠壁Ktrans值与HBI呈正相关(r=0.635,P<0.001),与CRP呈正相关(r=0.764,P<0.001);ADC值与HBI呈负相关(r=-0.614,P<0.001),与CRP呈负相关(r=-0.490,P<0.001)。病变肠壁HBI与CRP呈正相关(r=0.755,P<0.001),Ktrans与ADC值呈负相关(r=-0.348,P=0.013)。结论 MRI定量参数Ktrans和ADC可反映CD活动状态,且Ktrans的稳定性和敏感性优于ADC。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the value of MRI quantitative parameters including ADC and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) in assessment of the activity of Crohn's disease. Methods Fifty patients with CD were recruited, and all subjects underwent bowel examination with conventional MR, DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) scan. The quantitative parameters (ADC, Ktrans) and clinical data (Harvey-Bradshow index, C-reactive protein) were collected. According to HBI, all CD patients were divided into three groups such as severe group, mild-moderate group and static group. The differences of Ktrans and ADC among the three groups were compared. The correlation between quantitative parameters of MRI (ADC, Ktrans) and clinical data (HBI, CRP) were evaluated. Results In fifty patients with CD, there were 16 cases of static group, 21 cases of mild-moderate active group and 13 cases of severe group. The differences of Ktrans and ADC values among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05), and there were significant differences between any two groups (all P<0.05). There was positive correlations between Ktrans and HBI (r=0.635, P<0.001) and CRP (r=0.764, P<0.001). ADC value was negatively correlated with HBI (r=-0.614, P<0.001) and CRP (r=-0.490, P<0.001). There was a positive correlation between HBI and CRP (r=0.755, P<0.001). Ktrans was negatively correlated with ADC (r=-0.348, P=0.013). Conclusion Quantitative parameters of MRI (Ktrans and ADC) are contributed to assess the severity of CD, and Ktrans is more sensitive and stability.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器