周全红,康枫,康群凤,秦红军,陈世光,毕冬梅,赵建华,刘焱,李凯,闫川,王斌.前瞻性心电门控结合冠状动脉追踪冻结技术在高心率冠状动脉CT成像中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2015,31(6):936~939
前瞻性心电门控结合冠状动脉追踪冻结技术在高心率冠状动脉CT成像中的应用
Application of prospectively ECG-gating combined with snapshot freeze of coronary CT angiography in high heart rate patients
投稿时间:2015-01-04  修订日期:2015-03-31
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2015.06.037
中文关键词:  体层摄影术,X线计算机  辐射剂量  人体质量指数
英文关键词:Tomography, X-ray computed  Radiation dosage  Body mass index
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
周全红 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073 zhou_dianli@163.com 
康枫 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
康群凤 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
秦红军 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
陈世光 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
毕冬梅 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
赵建华 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
刘焱 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
李凯 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
闫川 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
王斌 北京电力医院放射科, 北京 100073  
摘要点击次数: 2168
全文下载次数: 1023
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨前瞻性心电门控结合冠状动脉追踪冻结(SSF)技术对快心率患者降低辐射剂量及保证图像质量的价值。方法 60例患者接受前瞻性心电门控扫描,心率为73~80次/分。根据患者体质量指数选择管电流为230~750 mA,管电压为100~120 kV。扫描后分别采用SSF重建及不采用SSF重建。计算患者的有效剂量(ED),并将其与回顾性心电门控螺旋扫描参数模拟计算的ED进行对比。采用美国心脏学会冠状动脉分段方法对其图像质量评分。结果 前瞻性心电门控结合SSF技术与不结合SSF技术的冠状动脉图像质量评分分别为 (3.41±0.59)分和(2.55±1.45)分(P<0.05)。前瞻性心电门控结合SSF技术与回顾性心电门控成像的ED分别为(4.86±0.80)mSv和(15.80±2.50) mSv (P<0.05)。结论 前瞻性心电门控结合SSF技术可明显减少辐射剂量,并同时获得满足临床诊断需要的图像质量。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the value of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) prospectively ECG-gating combined with snapshot freeze (SSF) on improving image quality and reducing radiation does in high heart rate patients. Methods Totally 60 patients with heart rate 73—80 bpm underwent CCTA using the prospectively ECG-gating combined with SSF. Tube voltage (100—120 kV) and tube current (230—750 mA) were selected based on patient body mass index. Images were reconstructed respectively with SSF or without SSF after scanning. Effective dose (ED) of prospectively ECG-gating combined with SSF were calculated and compared with the standard protocols using retrospective gating mode. Image quality were scored using the American Heart Association guideline. Results The image quality score of CCTA prospectively ECG-gating combined with SSF was 3.41±0.59, and without SSF was 2.55±1.45, difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). ED of CCTA prospectively ECG-gating combined with SSF was (4.86±0.80)mSv and without SSF was (15.80±2.50)mSv (P<0.05). Conclusion CCTA prospectively ECG-gating combined with SSF for high heart rate patients can ensure clinically acceptable image quality and reduce radiation dose.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器