高永艳,姚秀萍,王黎明,穆学涛,梁佳,树俊莲,刘卫星.超声造影和MRI诊断小肾癌的对比[J].中国医学影像技术,2015,31(5):758~761
超声造影和MRI诊断小肾癌的对比
Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI in diagnosis of small renal carcinoma
投稿时间:2014-08-17  修订日期:2015-02-04
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2015.05.030
中文关键词:  肾肿瘤  超声检查  造影剂  磁共振成像
英文关键词:Kidney neoplasms  Ultrasonography  Contrast media  Magnetic resonance imaging
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
高永艳 武警总医院超声科, 北京 100039  
姚秀萍 武警总医院超声科, 北京 100039  
王黎明 武警总医院超声科, 北京 100039  
穆学涛 武警总医院磁共振科, 北京 100039  
梁佳 武警总医院超声科, 北京 100039  
树俊莲 武警总医院超声科, 北京 100039  
刘卫星 武警总医院超声科, 北京 100039 liuweixing7@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 3207
全文下载次数: 988
中文摘要:
       目的 探讨CEUS和MRI对小肾癌的诊断价值。方法 收集可疑肾实性小结节患者32例。对所有患者行CEUS和MR检查,观察小肾癌的CEUS图像特点,评价CEUS和MRI对小肾癌的诊断效能。结果 CEUS示假包膜环状增强19例(19/21,90.47%),动脉期同/快进14例(14/21,66.67%),均匀增强14例(14/21,66.67%)。32例患者中,小肾癌21例,CEUS测量的结节大小[(1.95±0.62 cm)]与MRI测量结果[(1.87±0.69)cm]差异无统计学意义(t=1.6132,P>0.05)。CEUS诊断小肾癌的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率分别为85.71%(18/21)、81.82%(9/11)、90.00%(18/20)、75.00%(9/12)和84.36%(27/32),MRI为90.48%(19/21)、90.91%(10/11)、95.00%(19/20)、83.33%(10/12)和90.63%(29/32)。结论 CEUS对无症状的小肾癌具有重要的诊断价值,对于MR检查受限的患者,CEUS是可选择替代的较为准确的影像学诊断方法。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the value of CEUS and MRI in diagnosing of small renal carcinoma. Methods Thirty two patients were suspected with small renal solid lesions. All patient was underwent both CEUS and MRI. The image characteristics of CEUS were observed, and both CEUS and MRI diagnostic value were evaluated. Results In CEUS images, 19 cases (19/21, 90.47%) showed rim-like enhancement of pseudocapsule, 14 cases (14/21, 66.67%) showed same or quick wash-in and 14 cases (14/21,66.67%) showed homogeneous enhancement. Twenty one patients were finally diagnosed with small renal carcinoma. There was no statistically difference of lesion size measured by CEUS ([1.95±0.62]cm) and MRI ([1.87±0.69]cm; t=1.6132, P>0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the coincidence rate of CEUS for small renal cancer were 85.71% (18/21), 81.82% (9/11), 90.00% (18/20), 75.00% (9/12) and 84.36% (27/32), of MRI were 90.48% (19/21), 90.91% (10/11), 95.00% (19/20), 83.33% (10/12) and 90.63% (29/32). Conclusion CEUS has significant value in diagnosing asymptomatic small renal cancer, and it may be an alternative method for those who can not take MRI.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器