夏平,徐青松,郝敬明,胡春艾,曹伟,师毅冰,夏有生.时间分辨力-心动周期特性曲线在CT冠状动脉成像中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2015,31(1):127~131
时间分辨力-心动周期特性曲线在CT冠状动脉成像中的应用
Application of temporal resolution-cardiac cycle curve inmulti-slice spiral CT coronary angiography
投稿时间:2014-06-18  修订日期:2014-09-14
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2015.01.036
中文关键词:  体层摄影术,X线计算机  冠状血管  时间分辨力  球管旋转时间
英文关键词:Tomography, X-ray computed  Coronary vessels  Temporal resolution  Gantry rotation
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
夏平 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009 xiapzxx@126.com 
徐青松 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009  
郝敬明 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009  
胡春艾 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009  
曹伟 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009  
师毅冰 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009  
夏有生 徐州市中心医院CT室, 江苏 徐州 221009  
摘要点击次数: 2706
全文下载次数: 1356
中文摘要:
      目的 评价时间分辨力-心动周期特性曲线在CT冠状动脉成像中的应用价值。方法 将126例接受CT冠状动脉成像的患者作为研究组,根据患者心率采用不同的球管转速,并进行三扇区扫描。采用双扇区和三扇区两种方法重建。对照组为30例心率<65次/分患者,采用350 ms/rot的球管转速扫描,单扇区重建。比较各种球管转速、不同重建算法、不同心率分组的图像质量。结果 双扇区图像质量评分1级1191节段(1191/1708,69.73%),三扇区图像质量评分1级1370节段(1370/1708,80.21%),对照组图像质量评分1级348节段(348/418,83.25%),双扇区图像质量与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(Z=4.60,P<0.001);三扇区与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.15,P=0.13)。不同球管转速间图像质量评分差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.98,P=0.61)。结论 依照三扇区时间分辨力-心动周期曲线最佳成像条件选择扫描参数,可在65~122次/分的心率范围内获得优质、稳定的图像质量。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the applicable value of temporal resolution-cardiac cycle curve in the multi-slice spiral CT coronary angiography (MSCTCA). Methods Totally 126 patients undergoing MSCTCA with 320-slice spiral CT were enrolled. Optimum gantry rotation was chosen according to patient's heart rate, and scanning was done with three segment reconstruction algorithms. Scan data was reconstructed with two segment reconstruction algorithms and three segment reconstruction algorithms respectively. In control group, 30 patients whose heart beat were <65 bpm were treated with 350 ms/rot gantry rotation and half reconstruction. Image qualities were compared from the different gantry rotation, reconstruction algorithm and heart rate. Results All of 1191 segments (1191/1708, 69.73%) were graded score 1 in two segment reconstruction algorithms; 1370 segments (1370/1708, 80.21%) were graded score 1 in three segment reconstruction algorithms; 348 segments (348/418, 83.25%) were graded score 1 in control group. There was significant difference between two segments reconstruction algorithms and control group (Z=4.60, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between three segment reconstruction algorithms and control group (Z=0.15, P=0.13). Different gantry rotations had no influence on image quality (χ2=0.98, P=0.61). Conclusion According to the curve of temporal resolution-cardiac cycle, high image quality can be acquired in a range of heart rate of 65—122 bpm for CTCA through three segment reconstruction algorithms.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器