顾胜利,陈亚青,蒋珺,徐依耑,管雯斌.三维彩色血管能量成像评估乳腺癌预后[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(10):1523~1526
三维彩色血管能量成像评估乳腺癌预后
Three-dimensional color power angiography in assessment of prognosis in breast cancer
投稿时间:2014-05-15  修订日期:2014-08-01
DOI:
中文关键词:  乳腺肿瘤  超声检查, 多普勒  成像, 三维  预后
英文关键词:Breast neoplasms  Ultrasonography, Doppler  Imaging, three-dimensional  Prognosis
基金项目:上海交通大学医工交叉研究基金项目(YG2009MS05)、上海市科委重点项目(064119632)。
作者单位E-mail
顾胜利 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院超声科, 上海 200092  
陈亚青 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院超声科, 上海 200092 joychen1266@126.com 
蒋珺 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院超声科, 上海 200092  
徐依耑 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院超声科, 上海 200092  
管雯斌 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院病理科, 上海 200092  
摘要点击次数: 2281
全文下载次数: 947
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨三维彩色血管能量成像(3D-CPA)评估乳腺浸润性导管癌预后的价值。方法 回顾分析82例手术病理证实的浸润性导管癌患者的3D-CPA资料,获取并比较预后相关指标不同的肿瘤间3D-CPA参数,包括肿瘤内血管指数(VI)、血流指数(FI)和血管-血流指数(VFI)差异。结果 直径>2 cm、病理Ⅲ级、伴腋窝淋巴结转移、孕激素受体(PR)表达阴性肿瘤,其VI值高于直径≤2 cm、病理Ⅱ级、无腋窝淋巴结转移和PR表达阳性肿瘤(P均<0.05);直径>2 cm、雌激素受体(ER)表达阴性肿瘤FI值高于直径≤2 cm、ER表达阳性肿瘤(P均<0.05);直径>2 cm、病理Ⅲ级、PR表达阴性肿瘤VFI值高于直径≤2 cm、病理Ⅱ级和PR表达阳性肿瘤(P均<0.05);而不同人表皮生长因子-2表达肿瘤间VI、FI和VFI值差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 预后相关指标不同的乳腺癌3D-CPA参数存在差异,对预测预后具有潜在的临床应用价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the value of three-dimensional color power angiography (3D-CPA) in assessment of prognosis in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Methods 3D-CPA data of 82 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. 3D-CPA parameters, including vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization-flow index (VFI) were obtained and compared between tumors with different prognosis related factors. Results The tumors with diameter >2 cm, grade Ⅲ, metastasis of the lymph node and negative expression of progesterone receptor (PR) showed higher VI compared with tumors with diameter ≤2 cm, grade Ⅱ, non-metastasis of the lymph node and positive expression of PR (all P<0.05). The tumors with diameter >2 cm and negative expression of estrogen receptor (ER) showed higher FI compared with tumors with diameter ≤2 cm and positive expression of ER (both P<0.05). The tumors with diameter >2 cm, grade Ⅲ and negative expression of PR showed higher VFI compared with tumors diameter ≤2 cm, grade Ⅱ and positive expression of PR (all P<0.05). Tumors with different expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 had no significant differences in VI, FI and VFI (all P>0.05). Conclusion In breast cancer, parameters of 3D-CPA have differences among tumors with different prognosis related factors, which is of use in predicting the prognosis.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器