郑海亮,刘小丽,李兴东,温廷国,冯树理.256层CT头部扫描iDose 4TM重建图像空间分辨性能的模体实验[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(4):617~621
256层CT头部扫描iDose 4TM重建图像空间分辨性能的模体实验
Spatial resolution investigation on iDose 4TM with 256-slice CT in brain spiral scanning:A phantom study
投稿时间:2013-06-23  修订日期:2014-03-08
DOI:
中文关键词:  迭代重建  滤波反投影  空间分辨率  调制传递函数  体层摄影术,X线计算机
英文关键词:Iterative reconstruction  Filter back projection  Spatial resolution  Modulation transfer function  Tomography, X-ray computed
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(11005119);中国计量科学研究院院级课题(25-JB1336-13);北京世纪坛医院院级课题(2013C-11)。
作者单位E-mail
郑海亮 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院医学工程研究室, 北京 100038  
刘小丽 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院医学物质设备处, 北京 100038  
李兴东 中国计量科学研究院电离辐射计量科学研究所, 北京 100013  
温廷国 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院医学 放射中心, 北京 100038  
冯树理 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院医学工程研究室, 北京 100038 shulifeng1@hotmail.msn 
摘要点击次数: 3082
全文下载次数: 1028
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨256层Brilliance iCT头部扫描时不同扫描条件下各重建级别iDose空间分辨性能的差异。方法 采用256层Brilliance iCT和CT性能检测模体,获得头部扫描图像,以iDose和滤波反投影(FBP)两种方法进行重建,比较两种重建图像的调制传递函数(MTF)曲线之间的差异。结果 ①MTF曲线显示,同等辐射剂量条件下,相比FBP重建,iDose重建可提高1.75%~115.62%的空间分辨能力。②降低层厚会在一定程度上降低CT系统在xOy平面内的空间分辨能力。③层厚为0.9 mm时,iDose(6)的图像重建性能最好,层厚为2.5 mm时,iDose(5)的性能最好。④在保持千伏值、毫安秒及扫描层厚条件不变,螺距从0.203提高至0.391时空间分辨能力无显著差异。⑤保持毫安秒不变,同时改变管电流和扫描时间,使用iDose重建算法CT系统空间分辨能力无显著差异。结论 iDose在同等辐射剂量下能显著提高图像质量,一定程度上iDose重建图像的空间分辨力对螺距和管电流改变不敏感。为获得最佳图像质量,重建级别应与层厚相适应。
英文摘要:
      Objective To assess spatial resolution performance of various iDose reconstruction levels at Brilliance iCT 256 with brain scanning protocol under varied conditions. Methods CT images of brain were obtained using Brilliance iCT 256 and CT image quality phantom test. CT images were reconstructed using iDose 4TM and filter back projection (FBP). Modulation transfer function (MTF) of reconstructed CT images was calculated and compared. Results ①MTF of image with iDose was 1.75%-115.62% greater than FBP at equal radiation dose level. ②Spatial resolution in x-O-y plane would decrease at some extend when scanning slice depth decreases. ③For varied iDose levels, iDose (6) got the best MTF when slice depth was 0.9 mm, while iDose (5) gained the best MTF when slice depth was 2.5 mm. ④No obvious difference of MTF was found when pitch varied from 0.203 to 0.391 while voltage, mill-ample multiple second and slice depth constant kept the same. ⑤No obvious difference of MTF was found at the same mill-ample multiple second constant and different mill-ample and scanning time. Conclusion iDose can obviously increase spatial resolution at the same dose level, and spatial resolution of CT image with iDose reconstruction is not too much sensitive to pitch and lamp current to some extent. Reconstruction level should suit scanning depth in order to acquire best image quality.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器