| 管宇,夏艺,范丽,刘士远,于红.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者与肺功能正常吸烟者CT肺实质灌注成像对照[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(2):229~232 |
| 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者与肺功能正常吸烟者CT肺实质灌注成像对照 |
| Comparison on pulmonary perfusion imaging in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smokers with normal pulmonary function |
| 投稿时间：2013-04-28 修订日期：2013-06-21 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 体层摄影术,X线计算机 灌注成像 肺功能检查 |
| 英文关键词:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Tomography, X-ray computed Perfusion imaging Pulmonary function test |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（81000602）；上海市自然科学基金（10ZR1438900）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2164 |
| 全文下载次数: 1011 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 分析慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）患者及肺功能正常吸烟者CT肺实质灌注图像的差异。方法 对63例COPD患者及20名肺功能正常吸烟者（对照组）行肺CTPI，将COPD患者分为轻度亚组（16例）、中度亚组（18例）、重度亚组（11例）和极重度亚组（18例），在肺叶水平计算灌注缺损区与正常区CT值比值（RHU），比较各组体质量指数（BMI）、吸烟量及各肺叶RHU的差异。结果 对照组BMI与重度、极重度COPD亚组比较，对照组吸烟量与极重度COPD亚组比较差异均有统计学意义（P=0.006、0.002、0.007）。同组各肺叶RHU差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。对照组右肺下叶RHU与重度、极重度COPD亚组差异有统计学意义（P=0.03、0.02），其他各肺叶RHU各组差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。对照组与各COPD亚组RHU差异均有统计学意义（P均<0.05）；轻度与重度、与极重度COPD亚组，中度与极重度COPD亚组RHU差异均有统计学意义（P=0.022、0.001、0.003）。结论 RHU可区分COPD和肺功能正常吸烟者，有可能成为评估COPD严重程度的指标之一。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To observe the difference of pulmonary perfusion imaging in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smokers with normal pulmonary function. Methods All of 63 patients with COPD and 20 smokers with normal pulmonary function (control group) underwent CTPI. COPD patients were divided into mild, moderate, severe and extremely severe COPD subgroups. CT value ratio (RHU) of perfusion defect area and normal area were calculated at lobe level. The differences of body mass index (BMI), smoking and lung RHU were compared. Results There was significant difference of BMI between control group and severe and extremely severe COPD subgroups (P=0.006, 0.002), as well as between control group and extremely severe COPD subgroup (P=0.007). There was no significant difference of RHU at lobe level in each group (all P>0.05). There was significant difference between RHU for the right lung lobe of control group and that in severe and extremely severe COPD subgroups (P=0.03, 0.02), but not among other lobes in each groups (all P>0.05). There was significant difference between RHU in control group and each COPD subgroups (all P<0.05), between mild and moderate COPD (P=0.022), mild and extremely severe COPD (P=0.001), as well as moderate and extremely severe COPD subgroups (P=0.003). Conclusion RHU can distinguish COPD and smokers with normal pulmonary function, which may become a predictor of the severity for COPD. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
