张建新,陈麦林,杜笑松,侯丽娜,杨晓棠,王峻.碘基值定量分析初步判断食管鳞癌病理分级[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(12):1985~1988
碘基值定量分析初步判断食管鳞癌病理分级
Iodine concentration in preliminary analysis of pathological grading of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
投稿时间:2013-06-07  修订日期:2013-08-19
DOI:
中文关键词:  食管肿瘤  体层摄影术,X线计算机  病理分级
英文关键词:Esophageal neoplasms  Tomography, X-ray computed  Pathological grading
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
张建新 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 山西省肿瘤医院MR/CT室, 山西 太原 030013  
陈麦林 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所医学影像科, 恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室, 北京 100142  
杜笑松 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 山西省肿瘤医院MR/CT室, 山西 太原 030013  
侯丽娜 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 山西省肿瘤医院MR/CT室, 山西 太原 030013  
杨晓棠 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 山西省肿瘤医院MR/CT室, 山西 太原 030013 yxtbean@126.com 
王峻 山西医科大学第二医院放射科, 山西 太原 030001  
摘要点击次数: 2308
全文下载次数: 1035
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨碘基值定量分析在初步判断食管鳞癌(ESCC)病理分级中的价值。方法 对45例经手术病理证实的ESCC患者采用GE宝石CT能谱成像(GSI)行CT增强扫描,利用GSI分析软件在碘-水基物质图上测量病灶、相同时相胸主动脉及左心房的碘基值(IC),并计算病灶与胸主动脉及左心房的碘基值比值(A1、A2),对不同部位(胸上段、胸中段、胸下段)、不同病理分级(高分化、中分化、低分化)的病灶IC值及A1、A2值进行统计学分析。结果 胸上段病灶的IC值高于胸中段和胸下段;上、中段病灶间IC值差异无统计学意义(P=0.72),A1、A2值差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。高分化ESCC的IC值 明显高于中分化ESCC 和低分化ESCC ,三者间的IC值、A1、A2值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 碘-水基物质图上测定的IC值能反映不同病理组成物质的X线吸收系数,对ESCC的病理分级具有一定判断能力,对指导治疗及判断预后有一定临床价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe the clinical value of Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI) in preliminary assessment of pathology grading of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Totally 45 patients with histologically proved ESCC underwent enhanced scan with CT spectral imaging mode. Monochromatic images and iodine-water based material decomposion images were generated. Iodine concentration (IC) values of ROI of the lesion, thoracic aorta and left atrium on the same slice or phase were measured, and the ratio of lesions IC value with the thoracic aorta IC value (A1) and left atrium IC value (A2) were calculated respectively at the same time, and were compared among different section and pathology grading. Results IC value of lesions in upper section (mg/ml) were higher than that in middle section (mg/ml) and lower section (mg/ml), but no significant difference of IC value was found of lesions between upper section and middle section (P=0.72), nor of A1 and A2 (P>0.05). IC value of highly differentiated ESCC (mg/ml) was higher than that of the medium (mg/ml) and pour differentiated (mg/ml) ones. IC value, A1 and A2 of lesions among different pathological grading had statistically differences (all P<0.001). Conclusion IC value can reflect X-ray absorption coefficient of different pathological material and has certain value in guiding treatment, judging pathological grading and prognosis.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器