马春燕,刘爽,杨军,张妍,张立敏,李楠,于波.左心室整体及电极位置心肌纵向应变预测缺血性心力衰竭患者心脏再同步化治疗的长期疗效[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(12):1965~1968
左心室整体及电极位置心肌纵向应变预测缺血性心力衰竭患者心脏再同步化治疗的长期疗效
Evaluation on left ventricle global and regional longitudinal strain in predicting long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure
投稿时间:2013-06-27  修订日期:2013-09-10
DOI:
中文关键词:  心力衰竭,缺血性  心室功能,左  收缩同步性  心脏再同步化治疗
英文关键词:Heart failure, ischemic  Ventricular function, left  Systolic synchrony  Cardiac resynchronization therapy
基金项目:辽宁省科技厅科学计划项目(2011225020)。
作者单位E-mail
马春燕 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001 mcy_echo@163.com 
刘爽 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001  
杨军 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001  
张妍 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001  
张立敏 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001  
李楠 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001  
于波 中国医科大学附属第一医院心血管心内科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001  
摘要点击次数: 2224
全文下载次数: 801
中文摘要:
      目的 采用二维斑点追踪技术(STE)检测缺血性心力衰竭(HF)患者左心室收缩同步性、整体纵向应变(GLS)及左心室电极植入部位心肌纵向应变(RLS),探讨其在预测CRT长期疗效中的作用。方法 42例缺血性HF接受CRT,对其在术前1周和术后1年行STE检查,测量GLS及RLS,同时测量左心室18节段达峰值纵向应变时间标准差(T-LSSD)及前间壁和后壁达峰值径向应变的时间差(T-RSDif)作为收缩同步性指数,以术后1年左心室收缩末容积(LVESV)减小≥15%为CRT有效。结果 29例 CRT治疗有效(CRT-R组),13例治疗无效(CRT-NR组)。术前CRT-R组RLS、GLS、T-LSSD和T-RSDif大于CRT-NR组(P<0.001)。术前以RLS-11.5%预测CRT疗效的敏感度和特异度分别为80.00%和77.90%(AUC=0.84,P<0.001)。结论 通过STE检测左心室收缩同步性、GLS和电极植入部位RLS可预测缺血性心力衰竭患者的CRT长期疗效。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the role of left ventricular (LV) systolic synchrony and longitudinal strain (LS) obtained with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in predicting long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with ischemic heart failure (HF). Methods STE was performed in 42 patients with HF 1 week before and 1 year after CRT. Global LS (GLS), regional LS (RLS) and the LV synchrony index (SI), defined as SD in timing to peak longitudinal strain among 18 segments (T-LSSD), and the difference in timing to peak radial strain between LV anterior septal and posterior wall (T-RSDif) were calculated. Decrease ≥15% of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) one year after CRT was defined as response to CRT. Results Twenty-nine patients responded to CRT (CRT-R group), while 13 patients did not respond to CRT (CRT-NR group). Pre-CRT RLS, GLS, T-LSSD and T-RSDif were higher in CRT-R group compared with those in CRT-NR group (P<0.001). Taking RLS of -11.5% as standard for response to CRT, the sensitivity was 80.00%, the specificity was 77.90% (AUC=0.84, P<0.001). Conclusion Evaluation on systolic synchrony of LV, GLS and RLS with STE can predict long-term response to CRT in patients with ischemic HF.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器