凌文武,卢强,李加伍,马琳,全杰荣,杨蕗璐,罗燕.点定量弹性成像测量正常肝脏硬度的影响因素[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(11):1838~1841
点定量弹性成像测量正常肝脏硬度的影响因素
Impact factors in elastography point quantification measurement of normal liver stiffness
投稿时间:2013-06-04  修订日期:2013-08-14
DOI:
中文关键词:  弹性成像技术  肝脏  硬度值  影响因素
英文关键词:Elasticity imaging techniques  Liver  Stiffness value  Influencing factor
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81101060、81071163)。
作者单位E-mail
凌文武 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041  
卢强 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041  
李加伍 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041  
马琳 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041  
全杰荣 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041  
杨蕗璐 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041  
罗燕 四川大学华西医院超声科, 四川 成都 610041 luoyan77@vip.sina.com 
摘要点击次数: 3277
全文下载次数: 1127
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨点定量弹性成像(ElastPQ)测量正常肝脏硬度中的影响因素。方法 对293名正常人进行ElastPQ,获取肝脏硬度值,分析性别和年龄对肝脏硬度测量的影响。选取其中34名,分析不同肝段、呼吸时相、探头位置及操作者对肝脏硬度测量的影响。结果 S5的测值变异系数(CV)最小(19.94%),且与S1、S2、S3的硬度值差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),而与S4、S6、S7及S8相比差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);呼气末和吸气末肝脏硬度值分别为(4.14±0.93)kPa和(3.35±0.55)kPa(P<0.001);正常肝脏硬度值为(3.87±1.04)kPa,正常男性肝脏硬度值显著高于女性[(4.18±1.29)kPa vs (3.71±0.85)kPa,P=0.002];不同探头位置、操作者及年龄间的肝脏硬度值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 测量正常肝脏硬度时,应尽量于同一呼吸时相在右侧肋间隙选择S5进行;对于正常男性及女性,应分别制定不同的肝脏硬度参考值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the impact factors of normal liver stiffness measurement in elastography point quantification (ElastPQ). Methods Totally 293 normal subjects underwent liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by using ElastPQ, the liver stiffness values were recorded, and the impact of gender and age on liver stiffness were analyzed. The impact of different liver segments, respiratory phases, probe positions and examiners on LSM were evaluated in 34 subjects. Results S5 exhibited the lowest coefficient of variation (CV) on LSM (19.94%). Significant differences of liver stiffness value were found between S5 and S1, S2 and S3 (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference between S5 and S4, S6, S7 nor S8 (all P>0.05). The liver stiffness value at the end-expiration was significantly higher than that at the end-inspiration ([4.14±0.93]kPa vs [3.35±0.55]kPa, P<0.001). The normal liver stiffness value was (3.87±1.04)kPa, of men was significantly higher than that of women ([4.18±1.29]kPa vs [3.71±0.85]kPa, P=0.002). There was no significant difference among different probe positions, examiners and ages (P>0.05). Conclusion LSM should be performed at the same breathing phase in S5 with inter-costal approach by ElastPQ for normal liver. The reference values of liver stiffness for the normal men and women need to be defined differently.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器