徐俊玲,陈传亮,窦社伟,连建敏,闫峰山,李永丽.流入敏感翻转恢复序列MR血管造影诊断肾动脉狭窄[J].中国医学影像技术,2012,28(6):1221~1225
流入敏感翻转恢复序列MR血管造影诊断肾动脉狭窄
MR angiography with non-enhanced inflow-sensitive inversion recovery pulse sequence in diagnosis of renal artery stenosis
投稿时间:2011-12-05  修订日期:2012-01-18
DOI:
中文关键词:  磁共振血管造影术  肾动脉  流入敏感翻转恢复  体层摄影术,X线计算机  血管造影术
英文关键词:Magnetic resonance angiography  Renal artery  Inflow-sensitive inversion recovery  Tomography, X-ray computed  Angiography
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
徐俊玲 河南省人民医院放射科,河南 郑州 450003  
陈传亮 河南省人民医院放射科,河南 郑州 450003 henanccl@163.com 
窦社伟 河南省人民医院放射科,河南 郑州 450003  
连建敏 河南省人民医院放射科,河南 郑州 450003  
闫峰山 河南省人民医院放射科,河南 郑州 450003  
李永丽 河南省人民医院放射科,河南 郑州 450003  
摘要点击次数: 2916
全文下载次数: 1135
中文摘要:
       目的 前瞻性评价非对比增强流入敏感翻转恢复(IFIR)序列MRA(IFIR-MRA)对肾动脉狭窄的诊断价值。方法 对60例可疑肾血管性高血压患者行肾动脉IFIR-MRA和增强CTA检查,比较两种方法的图像质量、肾动脉显影效果和肾动脉狭窄分级。以Spearman相关系数评价两种方法所得结果的相关性。以CTA为参照,计算IFIR-MRA诊断肾动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确率。结果 CTA和IFIR-MRA均显示126支主肾动脉。IFIR-MRA图像质量、肾动脉分级及肾动脉狭窄诊断与CTA结果的Spearman相关系数分别为0.773、0.998和0.833(P均<0.001)。IFIR-MRA诊断肾动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、PPV、NPV和准确率分别为100%(23/23)、98.06%(101/103)、92.00%(23/25)、100%(101/101)和98.41%(124/126)。结论 以CTA为参照,非对比增强IFIR-MRA可良好显示肾动脉,诊断肾动脉狭窄具有很高的敏感度、特异度和准确率,可作为可疑肾动脉狭窄患者的首选检查方法。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe the diagnostic value of non-enhanced inflow-sensitive inversion recovery (IFIR) MRA (IFIR-MRA) in detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS). Methods Sixty patients with suspicious renovascular hypertension underwent both IFIR-MRA and enhanced CTA. The imaging quality, renal artery display and renal artery grading were all evaluated. Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between the two methods. Compared with CTA, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy rate for IFIR-MRA on detection RAS were calculated. Results Totally 126 main renal arteries in 60 patients were checked on CTA and IFIR-MRA, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.773 (P<0.001) for renal artery display, 0.998 (P<0.001) for renal arteries grading and 0.833 (P<0.001) for RAS detection. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of IFIR-MRA for detection RAS was 100% (23/23), 98.06% (101/103), 92.00% (23/25), 100% (101/101) and 98.41% (124/126), respectively. Conclusion Non-enhanced IFIR-MRA could gain quite good renal artery imaging quality and high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate for detecting RAS. It could be regarded as the first choice for imaging examination of patients with suspicious RAS.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器