欢迎访问《中国医学影像技术》网站。

2025-06-14 星期六
首页 | 本刊简介 | 编委会 | 收录情况 | 投稿须知 | 期刊订阅 | 科学家精神 | 科学数据银行 | 广告招商

陶冉,张久权,崔进国,王健.对比观察SWI与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI显示肝硬化铁沉积结节的价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2012,28(5):957~960

对比观察SWI与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI显示肝硬化铁沉积结节的价值

Comparison of SWI with T1WI, T2WI and T2^*WI in detecting liver siderotic nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis

投稿时间：2011-11-11 修订日期：2012-01-20

DOI：

英文关键词:Susceptibility weighted imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Siderotic nodules Signal intensity ratio Contrast noise ratio

基金项目:

作者	单位	E-mail
陶冉	中国人民解放军白求恩国际和平医院放射科, 河北石家庄 050082
张久权	第三军医大学西南医院放射科, 重庆 400038
崔进国	中国人民解放军白求恩国际和平医院放射科, 河北石家庄 050082
王健	第三军医大学西南医院放射科, 重庆 400038	wangjian_811@yahoo.com

摘要点击次数: 3443

全文下载次数: 1112

中文摘要:

目的评价SWI对肝硬化铁结节(SN)的检出率及其图像质量和检出结节数量,并与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI对比。方法 128例肝硬化患者接受MR T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI和SWI。2名高年资放射科医师在SPIN图像处理软件上分别计算并比较4种图像上的SN检出率、SN与周围肝实质的信号强度比(SIR)、CNR,并计算SN的数量。结果 MR T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI和SWI的SN检出率分别为12.50%(16/128)、24.22%(31/128)、41.41%(53/128)和62.50%(80/128),SIR分别为0.85±0.16、0.58±0.17、0.50±0.20和0.36±0.21,CNR分别为9.15±5.79、9.77±5.49、11.49±4.57和13.93±5.64,SN的数量分别为(2.56±1.39)个/例、(16.27±12.32)个/例、(42.95±28.32)个/例和(72.31±62.99)个/例。SWI对SN的检出率明显高于T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI(χ²=26.86,P<0.05),SWI的SIR和CNR明显优于T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI(P均<0.05),SWI检出的SN数量明显多于T1WI、T2WI、T2^*WI(P均<0.05)。结论 SWI在图像质量和SN的检出率以及检出数量上优于常规T1WI、T2WI和T2^*WI,是检查肝硬化患者SN最敏感的方法,也是常规MR扫描的有益补充。

英文摘要:

Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of SWI for detecting siderotic nodules (SN) in patients with liver cirrhosis, and to compare SWI with T1WI, T2WI and T2^*WI. Methods A total of 128 patients with chronic liver cirrhosis underwent MR T1WI, T2WI, T2^*WI and SWI. The detection rate and number of SN, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and CNR were evaluated by two senior radiologists independently on SPIN software and were compared with T1WI, T2WI, T2^*WI and SWI. Results The detection rate of SN with SWI (80/128, 62.50%) was higher than that with MR T1WI (16/128, 12.50%), T2WI (31/128, 24.22%), T2^*WI (53/128, 41.41%) (χ²=26.86, P<0.05), respectively. SIR of SWI (0.36±0.21) was lower than that of T1WI (0.85±0.16), T2WI (0.58±0.17), T2^*WI (0.50±0.20, P<0.05), respectively. CNR of SWI (13.93±5.64) was higher than that of T1WI (9.15±5.79), T2WI (9.77±5.49), T2^*WI (11.49±4.57, all P<0.05), respectively. The number of SN with SWI (72.31±62.99) was higher than that with T1WI (2.56±1.39), T2WI (16.27±12.32), T2^*WI (42.95±28.32, all P<0.05), respectively. Conclusion The imaging quality and detection rate for SN on SWI is higher than conventional MRI. SWI appears to provide the most sensitive method to detect SN in cirrhotic liver. It is a valuable complement to conventional liver MRI.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器