李可基,杜毅力,曹永政,彭格红,乔向彬.超声血管增强技术联合CDFI诊断肾动脉狭窄[J].中国医学影像技术,2012,28(3):496~498
超声血管增强技术联合CDFI诊断肾动脉狭窄
Ultrasound ClarifyTM vascular enhancement technology combined with CDFI in diagnosis of renal artery stenosis
投稿时间:2011-07-09  修订日期:2011-08-13
DOI:
中文关键词:  血管增强技术  超声检查,多普勒,彩色  肾动脉狭窄
英文关键词:Vascular enhancement technology  Ultrasonography, Doppler, color  Renal artery obstruction
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
李可基 遵义医学院附属医院超声科, 贵州 遵义 563003 44644931@qq.com 
杜毅力 遵义医学院附属医院超声科, 贵州 遵义 563003  
曹永政 遵义医学院附属医院超声科, 贵州 遵义 563003  
彭格红 遵义医学院附属医院超声科, 贵州 遵义 563003  
乔向彬 遵义医学院附属医院超声科, 贵州 遵义 563003  
摘要点击次数: 2482
全文下载次数: 884
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨超声ClarifyTM血管增强(VE)技术联合CDFI对肾动脉狭窄的诊断价值。方法 对93例患者(186支肾动脉)分别行常规二维超声联合CDFI、VE技术联合CDFI检测,与肾动脉造影检查结果相比较。结果 186支肾动脉中,常规二维超声联合CDFI检出10支肾动脉狭窄,21支肾动脉显示不清,肾动脉显示率为88.71%(165/186);VE技术联合CDFI检出16支肾动脉狭窄,7支肾动脉显示不清,肾动脉显示率96.24%(179/186)。肾动脉造影检查发现22支肾动脉狭窄,2支闭塞。常规二维超声联合CDFI的敏感度39.13%(9/24),特异度99.38%(161/162);VE技术联合CDFI的敏感度58.33%(14/24),特异度98.78%(160/162)。结论 VE技术联合CDFI对肾动脉的显示率及动脉狭窄的检出率比常规二维超声联合CDFI有较大提高。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the value of ultrasound ClarifyTM vascular enhancement (VE) technology combined with CDFI in diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Methods Ninety-three patients (186 renal arteries) were examined with conventional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound combined with CDFI as well as CDFI combined with VE technology, respectively, and the results were compared with those of renal angiography. Results Among 186 renal arteries, 10 renal arteries stenosis were detected using 2D ultrasound combined with CDFI, 21 renal arteries were not displayed clearly. The renal artery display rate of 2D ultrasound combined with CDFI was 88.71% (165/186). Meanwhile, 16 renal arteries stenosis were detected using VE technology combined with CDFI, 7 renal arteries were not displayed clearly. The renal artery display rate of VE technology combined with CDFI was 96.24% (179/186). Renal angiography showed 22 renal arteries stenosis, and 2 blocked. The sensibility and specificity of 2D ultrasound combined with CDFI in diagnosis of renal artery stenosis was 39.13% (9/24) and 99.38% (161/162), which of VE technology combined with CDFI was 58.33% (14/24) and 98.78% (160/162), respectively. Conclusion Comparing with 2D ultrasound combined with CDFI, VE technology combined with CDFI can improve renal artery display rate and the detection rate of renal artery stenosis.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器