乔红艳,王锡明,段艳华,纪晓鹏,杨子峰.双源CT前瞻性心电门控肺动脉成像诊断肺动脉栓塞[J].中国医学影像技术,2012,28(1):86~89
双源CT前瞻性心电门控肺动脉成像诊断肺动脉栓塞
Dual source CT prospective electrocardiography-gated pulmonary angiography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
投稿时间:2011-06-08  修订日期:2011-08-17
DOI:
中文关键词:  肺动脉栓塞  辐射剂量  体层摄影术,X线计算机
英文关键词:Pulmonary embolism  Radiation dose  Tomography, X-ray computed
基金项目:山东省科技攻关项目(2010GG0020217)。
作者单位E-mail
乔红艳 山东大学医学院,山东 济南 250012
山东省医学影像学研究所CT室,山东 济南 250021 
 
王锡明 山东省医学影像学研究所CT室,山东 济南 250021
山东省心脑血管疾病诊治重点实验室,山东 济南 250021 
wxming369@163.com 
段艳华 山东大学医学院,山东 济南 250012
山东省医学影像学研究所CT室,山东 济南 250021 
 
纪晓鹏 山东大学医学院,山东 济南 250012
山东省医学影像学研究所CT室,山东 济南 250021 
 
杨子峰 山东省医学影像学研究所CT室,山东 济南 250021
泰山医学院研究生部,山东 泰安 271016 
 
摘要点击次数: 4005
全文下载次数: 1203
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨双源CT前瞻性心电门控(简称前门控)肺动脉成像在诊断肺动脉栓塞(PE)中的应用价值。方法 对60例PE患者行双源CT肺动脉成像,按扫描方式随机分为3组:A组,前门控扫描(n=20);B组,回顾性心电门控(简称后门控)扫描(n=20);C组,非心电门控(简称非门控)胸部强化扫描(n=20)。比较3组间的有效辐射剂量(ED)和图像质量评分。结果 3组患者的ED分别为(4.95±1.81)mSv、(15.91±5.01)mSv、(4.61±1.16)mSv;A、B组间和B、C组间差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),A、C组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组图像质量评分的总分分别为57、58、45,A、C组间和B、C组间差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),A、B组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 前瞻性心电门控技术可在保证图像质量的同时降低辐射剂量,是诊断PE安全、可靠的方法。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the application value of dual source CT (DSCT) prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Totally 60 patients with PE were randomly divided into 3 groups (each n=20). Prospective ECG-gated, retrospective ECG-gated pulmonary angiography and non ECG-gated thoracic enhanced scan was performed to group A, group B and group C, respectively. The effective dose (ED) and image quality score of 3 groups were compared. Results The value of ED was (4.95±1.81)mSv in group A, (15.91±5.01)mSv in group B and (4.61±1.16)mSv in group C, respectively. There was statistical difference between group A and B, as well as between group B and C (both P<0.05), while there was no statistical difference between group A and C (P>0.05). The total points of image quality score in 3 groups were 57, 58 and 45, respectively. Statistical differences were found between group A and B and between group A and C (both P<0.05), but no statistical difference was found between group B and C (P>0.05). Conclusion Prospective giving consideration to image quality and radiation dosage in diagnosing PE, ECG-gated pulmonary angiography should be considered as a safe and credible method.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器