陈世沛,赵张平,李剑波,朱文玲,彭容.数字断层融合技术对肺内非钙化性结节灶检出能力评价[J].中国医学影像技术,2011,27(11):2234~2237 |
数字断层融合技术对肺内非钙化性结节灶检出能力评价 |
Assessment on the detectability of non-calcified pulmonary nodules with chest digital tomosynthesis |
投稿时间:2011-04-24 修订日期:2011-07-29 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 断层融合术 放射摄影术 孤立性肺结节 诊断显像 |
英文关键词:Tomosynthesis Radiography Solitary pulmonary nodule Diagnostic imaging |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 3129 |
全文下载次数: 1161 |
中文摘要: |
目的 探讨胸部数字断层融合摄影(DTS)与常规数字X线摄影(CDR)对肺部非钙化结节的检出能力。方法 对41例肺内非钙化结节患者行胸部DTS和CDR检查,以MDCT结果作为参照,分析胸部DTS和CDR对肺内不同直径的非钙化结节性病灶的显示结果。结果 41例患者经CT发现260个结节,胸部DTS发现238个,CDR发现74个。胸部DTS和CDR对直径3~5 mm、6~10 mm及>10 mm肺部非钙化结节的敏感度分别是86.36%(114/132)、95.60%(87/91)、100%(37/37)和10.61%(14/132)、37.36%(34/91)、70.27%(26/37)。对于直径≤10 mm的肺部非钙化结节,胸部DTS的检出能力明显优于CDR(P<0.01)。CDR对肺内非钙化结节性病灶总的敏感度为28.46%(74/260),胸部DTS则为91.54%(238/260),二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 对于检出肺部非钙化结节,胸部DTS比CDR更具优势,敏感度更高,特别对于直径≤10 mm的非钙化结节。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To compare chest digital tomosynthesis (DTS) with conventional digital radiography (CDR) in the detection of non-calcified pulmonary nodules. Methods Totally 41 patients with non-calcified pulmonary nodules were examined with chest DTS and CDR. Taking MSCT findings as references, the sensitivity of chest DTS and CDR for detection of non-calcified pulmonary nodules were calculated and compared. Results CT showed 260 nodules in 41 patients, while chest DTS found 238 nodules and CDR found 74 nodules. The sensitivity for chest DTS for 3 groups nodules (3-5, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) was 86.36% (114/132), 95.60% (87/91), 100% (37/37), respectively, while for CDR was 10.61% (14/132), 37.36% (34/91), 70.27% (26/37), respectively. For nodules with diameter ≤10 mm, chest DTS could detect more lesions than CDR (P<0.01). The total sensitivity for CDR was 28.46% (74/260), for DTS was 91.54% (238/260), there was statistical difference (P<0.01). Conclusion For the detection of non-calcified pulmonary nodules, chest DTS is better than CDR, especially for non-calcified nodules less than 10 mm. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|