广旸,解丽梅.超声造影和增强CT诊断肝脏局灶性病变的Meta分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(6):1040~1042 |
超声造影和增强CT诊断肝脏局灶性病变的Meta分析 |
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of focal liver lesions: Meta-analysis |
投稿时间:2008-12-03 修订日期:2009-02-17 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 肝脏病变 超声检查 造影剂 体层摄影术,X线计算机 Meta分析 |
英文关键词:Liver diseases Ultrasonography Contrast media Tomography, X-ray computed Meta-analysis |
基金项目:辽宁省教育厅高等学校科研项目计划(2008742)。 |
|
摘要点击次数: 2250 |
全文下载次数: 919 |
中文摘要: |
目的 通过Meta分析比较超声造影(CEUS)和增强CT(CECT)对肝脏局灶性病变的诊断价值。 方法 检索PubMed和中国期刊网CNKI数据库关于CEUS及CECT诊断肝脏局灶性病变的中英文文献,并对文献进行评价和筛选。应用Metadisc软件对纳入的试验结果进行分析。 结果 CEUS诊断肝脏局灶性病变共纳入2041例,合并敏感度为89.00%,合并特异度为88.00%,加权SROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.9666。CECT诊断肝脏局灶性病变共纳入686例,合并敏感度为93.00%,合并特异度为84.00%,加权SROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.9610。 结论 CEUS与CECT对肝脏局灶性病变诊断准确性差异无统计学意义。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for focal liver lesions. Methods PubMed and CNKI database were searched for English and Chinese language articles related to CEUS and CECT diagnosis for focal liver lesions. Data were analyzed with Metadisc software. Results A total of 2041 specimens were included in CEUS group and the sensitivity, specificity and the AUC of weighted summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 89.00%, 88.00% and 0.9666, respectively; 686 specimens were included in CECT group and the sensitivity, specificity and the AUC of weighted SROC curve was 93.00%, 84.00% and 0.9610, respectively. Conclusion The accuracy of CEUS and CECT has no difference in diagnosis of focal liver lesions. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |