高文,陈敏华,严昆,杨薇,孙谊,邢宝才.射频消融治疗非手术适应证小肝癌疗效分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(2):254~257
射频消融治疗非手术适应证小肝癌疗效分析
Therapeutic effect of radiofrequency ablation in unsuitable operative small hepatocellular carcinoma
投稿时间:2006-10-12  修订日期:2006-11-14
DOI:
中文关键词:  射频消融  手术切除  原发性小肝癌  生存率
英文关键词:Radiofrequency ablation  Surgical resection  Small hepatocellular carcinoma  Survival rate
基金项目:本课题受北京市重大项目培育专项基金(Z000519004031)、首都医学发展科研基金重点学科基金资助项目(ZD199909)资助。
作者单位E-mail
高文 北京大学临床肿瘤学院北京肿瘤医院超声科,北京 100036 gaowen330@yahoo.com.cn 
陈敏华 北京大学临床肿瘤学院北京肿瘤医院超声科,北京 100036  
严昆 北京大学临床肿瘤学院北京肿瘤医院超声科,北京 100036  
杨薇 北京大学临床肿瘤学院北京肿瘤医院超声科,北京 100036  
孙谊 北京大学临床肿瘤学院北京肿瘤医院外科,北京 100036  
邢宝才 北京大学临床肿瘤学院北京肿瘤医院外科,北京 100036  
摘要点击次数: 2875
全文下载次数: 1440
中文摘要:
      目的 评价超声引导下射频消融(RFA)作为治疗非手术适应证原发性小肝癌(SHCC)的临床疗效。方法 53例≤3 cm的HCC行超声引导下RFA,肿瘤平均大小2.5 cm,同期行手术切除治疗的34例<3 cm的HCC作为对照组。肿瘤平均大小2.6 cm。回顾性分析RFA组与手术切除组治疗小肝癌的疗效及生存率。采用t检验及χ2检验分析两组间数值的差异性,用Kaplan-Meier法计算两组病例的生存率。结果 平均生存时间RFA组为(54.9±3.8)个月,手术组为(55.6±5.0)个月;1、2、3、4年总生存率RFA组分别为95.9%、87.0%、74.5%和61.9%,手术组为94.1%、87.8%、75.3%和70.7%(P=0.743);1、2、3年无瘤生存率分别为RFA组82.8%、70.1%、57.5%,手术组85.1%、69.7%、57.1%;二者间均无明显差异(P=0.935)。RFA组3年以上总生存率较手术组略低;RFA组局部复发率为4.8%(4/84灶)。结论 RFA因用时短、损伤小、并发症少等优势成为非手术适应证的SHCC病人的首选治疗方法,并可获得接近手术治疗的生存率。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC) which were unsuitable for surgery. Methods Fifty-three patients with HCC ≤3 cm underwent ultrasound guided RFA. The average size of tumor was 2.5 cm. At the same period, 34 patients with HCC ≤3 cm received surgical resection and were serviced as control group. The treatment efficacy and survival rate of SHCC between RFA group (n=53) and resection group (n=34) was retrospectively analyzed. Statistical methods were Kaplan-Meier and t-test and chi-square test. Results The mean survival of RFA group was (54.9±3.8) month. The overall 1, 2, 3, 4 year survival rates of SHCC in RFA group were 95.9%, 87.0%, 74.5% and 61.9%, respectively, which in resection group were 94.1%, 87.8%, 75.3% and 70.7% (P=0.743); And the disease-free survival rates in RFA group were 82.8%, 70.1% and 57.5%, respectively, which in resection group were 85.1%, 69.7% and 57.1%. There were no significant difference between the two groups. The local recurrence rate of RFA group was 4.8% (4/84 tumors). In follow-up period, Eleven and 4 patients died in RFA group and resection group, respectively, due to liver failure (or tumor progression). The complication rate in RFA group was significantly lower than that in resection group. Conclusion RFA could achieve the comparable efficacy to surgery in SHCC unsuitable for surgery. It could be used as safe and effective method to treat small HCC for its high survival rates, easy operation and mini-invasiveness.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器