| 刘豆豆.颞颌关节投照方法的探讨[J].中国医学影像技术,2000,16(3):0241~242 |
| 颞颌关节投照方法的探讨 |
| Radiograph Comparasion of Schuller’s Position and Modif ied Schuller’sPosition of Temporo-mandibular Joint |
| 投稿时间：1999-10-06 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 颞颌关节 X 线片 技术 |
| 英文关键词:Temporo-mandanbular joint Radiograph Technique |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1522 |
| 全文下载次数: 73 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 比较许氏位和许氏改良位两种方法的应用价值。方法 颅骨标本一具,行许氏位和许氏改良位
投照。99 例正常成人,其中男50 例,女49 例,年龄16～22 岁(平均20 岁) 。48 侧行许氏位投照为一组,150 侧许氏
改良位投照为另一组。结果 X 线片质量按一类(优) ,二类(良好) ,三类(差) 分类方法进行分析。许氏改良位组,一
类片占82167 % ,二类片占10167 % ,三类片占6167 %。许氏位组,一类片占37150 % ,二类片占29117 % ,三类片占
33133 %。统计学比较χ2 = 40149 。P < 01001 ,差别显著。结论 许氏改良位是显示颞凳关节诸结构的好方法。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the clinical value of Schuller’s position and modified Schuller’s position radiographs.
Methods One sample of cranial bone ,99 adult persons including 50 men and 49 femen ,age of 16～22 year old (mean age
20 year old ) were taken 48 Schuller’s position radiographs and 150 modified Schuller’s position radiographs. Results 3
claass radiographs (first-better ,Second-good and third class-bad radiographs) were divided depended on the radiograph quality. The modified Schuller’s position radiographs were first class 82. 67 % , second class 10. 67 % and third class 6. 67 %
seperately. The Schuller’s position radiographs were first class 37. 5 % ,second class 29. 1 % ,third class 33. 33 % seperately.
There is marked statistics differential between the modified Schuller’s position and Schuller’s position radiographs (χ2 =
40. 49 , P < 01001) . Conclusion Modified Schuller’s position radiographs were a good projection method to display the
tatol structures of temporo2mandanbular joint . |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
