| 邓文明,康文焱,文洁,刘周,黄华,王云飞,张艳,罗德红.对比水-脂分离成像技术与频率选择饱和法在头颈部增强MRI中的脂肪抑制效果[J].中国医学影像技术,2018,34(9):1390~1394 |
| 对比水-脂分离成像技术与频率选择饱和法在头颈部增强MRI中的脂肪抑制效果 |
| Comparison of fat suppression effect of Dixon and frequency-selective saturation in head and neck contrast-enhanced MRI |
| 投稿时间：2018-02-06 修订日期：2018-06-08 |
| DOI：10.13929/j.1003-3289.201802038 |
| 中文关键词: 磁共振成像 水-脂分离 频率选择饱和 脂肪抑制 |
| 英文关键词:Magnetic resonance imaging Water-fat separation Frequency selective saturation Fat suppression |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1921 |
| 全文下载次数: 862 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 对比分析水-脂分离技术（Dixon技术）与频率选择饱和法（FS）在头颈部增强MRI中的脂肪抑制效果。方法 对接受头颈部增强MR检查的49例患者行Dixon和FS脂肪抑制T1WI。由2名放射科医师评价其脂肪抑制效果，计算并比较2种图像间CNR和磁场中心层面（小脑、延髓）、偏离磁场中心层面（颞叶、咬肌、锁骨）的SNR。结果 49例患者的Dixon图像中，2名医师分别记录了14处和17处脂肪抑制效果不佳的区域，一致性好（Kappa=0.858，P<0.001）；FS图像中分别记录192处和175处脂肪抑制效果不佳区域，一致性好（Kappa=0.890，P<0.001）。在磁场中心层面，Dixon图像噪声小于FS图像（P<0.001），小脑SNR、延髓SNR及CNR优于FS组（P均<0.05）。在偏离磁场中心层面，Dixon图像噪声小于FS图像（P=0.010），咬肌SNR优于FS图像（P=0.010），锁骨SNR小于FS图像（P<0.001）；2种图像颞叶SNR和CNR差异均无统计学意义（P均>0.05）。结论 对于头颈部增强MRI，应用Dixon技术较FS能获得更好的图像质量和脂肪抑制效果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To evaluate the fat suppression efficacy of Dixon technique compared with frequency-selective saturation (FS) in head and neck contrast-enhanced MRI. Methods Totally 49 patients underwent contrast-enhanced T1WI of head and neck with both Dixon technique and FS technique. The efficacy of fat suppression was evaluated by two radiologists, while CNR between two sets of images and SNR of images were compared, including the center of magnetic field (corresponding to cerebellum and oblongata) and the periphery of magnetic field (corresponding to temporal lobe, masseter, and clavicle), respectively. Results Among the images acquired using Dixon technique, 14 and 17 areas with unsatisfactory fat suppression were recorded by two radiologists, respectively (Kappa=0.858, P<0.001), whereas 192 and 175 areas were recorded in the images acquired using FS technique, both showed great agreement between the two radiologists (Kappa=0.890, P<0.001). In the center of magnetic field, image noise of the Dixon image was significantly lower than that of the FS image (P<0.001), while SNR in the cerebellum, oblongata and CNR of the Dixon image were all superior to those in the FS image (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, in the peripheral magnetic field, similarly, image noise of the Dixon image was significantly lower than that of the FS image (P=0.010), and SNR in the masseter of the Dixon image was higher than that of the FS image (P=0.010). However, SNR in the clavicle of the Dixon image was lower than that of the FS image (P<0.001), and no statistical difference was found in SNR of temporal lobe nor CNR between the two kinds of images (both P>0.05). Conclusion In contrast-enhanced MRI of head and neck, using Dixon technique can obtain images with quality and fat suppression better than FS technique. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
