丁新华,胥萍,雷海燕,王佳冰,童明辉,王海永,童磊.剪切波弹性模量鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的Meta分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2017,33(3):404~409
剪切波弹性模量鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的Meta分析
Shear-wave elastic modulus for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: Meta-analysis
投稿时间:2016-06-26  修订日期:2017-01-07
DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201606167
中文关键词:  弹性成像技术  乳腺肿瘤  Meta分析
英文关键词:Elasticity imaging techniques  Breast neoplasms  Meta-analysis
基金项目:兰州市科技计划(2013-3-29)。
作者单位E-mail
丁新华 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030  
胥萍 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030  
雷海燕 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030  
王佳冰 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030  
童明辉 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030 tongmh1962@126.com 
王海永 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030  
童磊 兰州大学第二医院超声3科, 甘肃 兰州 730030  
摘要点击次数: 1714
全文下载次数: 1025
中文摘要:
      目的 采用Meta分析评价剪切波弹性模量鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的价值。方法 检索2016年4月前有关剪切波弹性成像鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性肿块的中文及英文文献。通过Meta分析评价弹性模量参数(Emax、Emea、Eratio、Esd)鉴别诊断乳腺良恶性肿块的效能。结果 共纳入文献31篇。弹性模量Emax的合并敏感度(SSEN)为0.87[95%CI(0.83,0.91)],合并特异度(SSPE)为0.91[95%CI(0.87,0.93)];Emea的SSEN为0.84[95%CI(0.77,0.89)],SSPE为0.88[95%CI(0.84,0.91)];Eratio的SSEN为0.88[95%CI(0.83,0.91)],SSPE为0.87[95%CI(0.80,0.91)];Esd的SSEN为0.85[95%CI(0.80,0.89)],SSPE为0.90[95%CI(0.85,0.94)]。Emax、Emea、Eratio、Esd合并受试者工作特性曲线的曲线下面积分别为0.95、0.93、0.93、0.93。结论 剪切波弹性模量参数有助于鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块,其中Emax的诊断效能最优。
英文摘要:
      Objective To assess the value of shear-wave elastic modulus for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using Meta-analysis. Methods Relevant Chinese and foreign articles about shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions were collected from the literatures published before Apr.2016. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the overall ability of the shear wave elastic modulus including Emax, Emea, Eratio and Esd. Results Totally 31 studies were brought into the Meta-analysis. The summarized sensitivity (SSEN) and summarized specificity (SSPE) of Emax were 0.87(95%CI[0.83, 0.91]) and 0.91 (95%CI[0.87, 0.93]). The SSEN and SSPE of Emea were 0.84 (95%CI[0.77, 0.89]) and 0.88 (95%CI[0.84, 0.91]), The SSEN and SSPE of Eratio were 0.88(95%CI[0.83, 0.91]) and 0.87 (95%CI[0.80, 0.91], the SSEN and SSPE of Esd were 0.85 (95%CI[0.80, 0.89]) and 0.90 (95%CI[0.85, 0.94]). The summarized receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of Emax, Emea, Eratio and Esd were 0.95, 0.93, 0.93 and 0.93. Conclusion The shear wave elastic modulus contribute to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Among these indices, Emax is the best one.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器